Tag: Texas

  • Shifting Immigration Opinions in Del Rio, Texas, Are Disrupting Local Politics — ProPublica

    DEL RIO, Texas — In 2008, Joe Frank Martinez beat a Republican incumbent to become the first Latino elected sheriff along this 110-mile stretch of border. Nearly 16 years later, in mid-September, Martinez stood in front of several dozen voters at the San Felipe Lions Club, having to campaign harder than ever before, and on an issue that wasn’t a factor in his previous elections: immigration.

    The 68-year-old Democrat had been in law enforcement for nearly five decades, and save for a little more than a year when he was stationed elsewhere as a state trooper, Martinez told the audience, he’d spent them ensuring the safety of residents in Val Verde County. He had mastered politics in this place nearly three hours west of San Antonio, where residents prided themselves on voting for the person they liked best instead of a party. He’d handily won each of his elections and ran unopposed four years ago when the county tipped for Donald Trump.

    Since then, it had been a tumultuous time, Martinez acknowledged to those assembled in the cafeteria-like space. They’d gone through a pandemic. They’d contended with a winter storm that had left hundreds of Texans dead. And then, he said, “We faced the Haitians.”

    He didn’t explain what he meant, and he didn’t have to. The memory of nearly 20,000 primarily Haitian immigrants — the equivalent of more than half of the population in Del Rio — arriving at the border almost all at once and held under the international bridge for two weeks in September 2021 has been seared into the minds of residents here. Many feared it could happen again and questioned whether Martinez was tough enough on immigration.

    Immigration is not part of Martinez’s job. But in Del Rio, like in other majority Latino border communities across the country, the issue is high on voters’ minds and is disrupting long-standing political allegiances. The barrel-chested lawman with a booming voice has experienced those disruptions firsthand. In a community where about 80% of residents are Latino, some had begun painting the Democratic sheriff as soft on immigration and falsely accused him of aiding unauthorized crossings.

    The majority Latino border town is highly dependent on government jobs, many of which are tied to military readiness and immigration enforcement.


    Credit:
    Liz Moughon/ProPublica

    Sometimes the attacks happened openly. When he pulled immigrants who had arrived at the banks of the river out of the water to keep them from drowning, Republicans accused him of helping people enter the country illegally. Some residents, including supporters, criticized Martinez on social media when they learned he would be endorsed by the Bexar County sheriff based in San Antonio who, during a speech at the Democratic National Convention, called Trump self-serving and accused the former president of making border sheriffs’ jobs harder when he killed a bipartisan border security deal earlier this year.

    Other times, some of those who turned against Martinez did so without saying a word. A sign he placed at a longtime friend’s house had been replaced by one with his opponent’s slogan about “bringing order to the border.”

    Standing in front of the crowd gathered at the Lions Club, Martinez shared a dizzying array of charts he’d brought along to respond to his critics. Things were in order at the border. Val Verde was seeing some of the lowest numbers of immigrants crossing in years, even lower than in neighboring counties where sheriffs had gone as far as to allow militias to operate.

    As for whether the Haitian migrant episode could happen again — the question he knew was looming in people’s minds — he reminded them that it was federal authorities, not his office, who controlled border crossings.

    He was as upset as they were with President Joe Biden’s response, and he’d been very public about saying as much. He hoped that when it came to the race for sheriff, they would judge him on how he’d handled the responsibilities assigned to him. How he’d served Val Verde, like his father before him, as a lawman, neighbor, husband and father; that who he was outweighed his affiliation with any party.

    This time, however, he wasn’t sure the pitch would work.

    “I want to try to keep my campaign at the local level,” Martinez said in an interview.

    “I might be blind to the fact that it can’t be done.”

    From left: Leo, Joe Frank and David Martinez reminisce about the family’s history and growing up only a couple of minutes from the border in a home where immigrants would often come by asking for a meal or temporary work.

    Shifting Politics

    It’s long been understood that the Latino vote is neither monolithic nor reliably Democratic. Places such as Del Rio, a deeply Catholic border city whose economy depends heavily on law enforcement jobs, have always held conservative views. Republicans like former President George W. Bush won here by appealing to those views while arguing for a compassionate approach to immigration.

    What We’re Watching

    During Donald Trump’s second presidency, ProPublica will focus on the areas most in need of scrutiny. Here are some of the issues our reporters will be watching — and how to get in touch with them securely.

    Portrait of Joshua Kaplan

    Joshua Kaplan

    I will be covering how the U.S. government is using its power abroad, with a particular interest in the intersection of business and foreign affairs.

    And I’m always interested in conflicts of interest in any form.

    Portrait of Renee Dudley

    Renee Dudley

    I report on technology and cybersecurity.

    Contact me to discuss big tech, AI and how the nation is confronting the threat of cyber warfare. I welcome the opportunity to discuss complex, esoteric topics.

    Portrait of Mark Olalde

    Mark Olalde

    I’m watching how Trump delivers on his promise to dismantle environmental laws, rules and regulations, with an eye toward at the Department of the Interior and its agencies.

    My focus is natural resources, climate change and public health, especially in the West.

    Portrait of Annie Waldman

    Annie Waldman

    I am an investigative health care reporter digging into how money and influence impact the American health care system.

    I am eager to hear from patients, doctors, federal agency workers and industry insiders about how the new administration is approaching health care.

    We’re trying something new. Was it helpful?

    Until recently, the party’s far-right shift on immigration hadn’t managed to make significant inroads in border communities. Conservative assertions about the issue, particularly those that painted immigration as an “invasion,” had failed to resonate with people on the border precisely because they knew better from living there. To them, the border was a fundamental feature of their day-to-day lives and an engine of their economies, not something to be afraid of. A decade ago, the overwhelming majority of immigrants who crossed the border were from Mexico. And the majority of the Latinos living on the United States side of the border had roots in Mexico as well.

    That’s changed, as have other immigration patterns at the border, and so have the attitudes of those who live here. Democratic politics have been slow to keep up — at least rhetorically — with those shifts. But Republicans have seized on them to move more voters into their camp. The state’s Republican Party no longer attempts to strike a balance on immigration. In fact, during this presidential cycle, it has gone even further by using the issue as a litmus test for whether it can turn border communities red, not just in their choices for state and federal candidates but for local ones too.

    Beginning in 2014, the numbers of Central American families and unaccompanied minors arriving at the border started to increase. The sight of juveniles held in makeshift camps on area military bases stirred political tensions in border communities and beyond. Later, the border became ground zero for Trump’s anti-immigration efforts, which involved separating children from their parents and forcing Central American asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico until they were given a date to appear in U.S. immigration court. Neither of those efforts had a lasting impact on the number of people arriving at the border, but they forced more immigrants to be stuck on the Mexican side for longer periods of time — and disruptions on the Mexican side of the border almost always ripple into the U.S. side.

    In an unprecedented effort to help the United States keep immigrants from arriving at the border, Mexico began detaining them and transporting them farther south. It also allowed the United States to turn back Mexican nationals and some Central Americans, but not most other immigrants. When word got out among would-be immigrants in South America, West Africa, China and Haiti, they began arriving in such large numbers that they overwhelmed the border, along with several of the U.S. towns and cities where they ultimately landed.

    The thousands of Haitians who arrived in Del Rio three years ago shook the city because it was like nothing people there had experienced in recent history. And like Martinez, a lot of residents here have histories that go back a long way.

    The Martinez siblings pose for a family photo during Easter Sunday in 1966.


    Credit:
    Courtesy of the Martinez family

    His grandparents migrated from Italy and Mexico more than 100 years ago, attracted by the area’s fertile land and ranches. One grandmother fled instability and violence leading up to the Mexican Revolution. Growing up, Martinez recalls immigrants knocking on the door of his family’s home, asking for a meal and temporary work. Sometimes that meant a little less food on the table or that the shed in the backyard got yet another fresh coat of paint it didn’t really need.

    Martinez and his nine siblings learned to move easily in two cultures.

    “My dad always emphasized to us: We’re in this country, we’re Americans first,” said his brother Leonel Martinez Jr., 67, who runs a binational company that makes leather horse saddles in Ciudad Acuña, Mexico, and sells them in the United States. “He also stressed that we should never forget our roots.”

    A staunch Catholic and Democrat, the family patriarch looms large in the choices the siblings make. He was active in fighting for equal rights at a time when Mexican Americans were excluded from many activities and did not have a voice in government. He co-founded a civic group to help bring sewer lines, paved roads and mailboxes to his predominantly Mexican American neighborhood; helped elect the city’s first Mexican American mayor; and dreamed of becoming the first elected Hispanic sheriff for Del Rio — a dream he held on to until his death at the age of 51.

    Because of him, the brothers are Democrats too, but in varying ways.

    Leonel, who wears a goatee and goes by Leo, voted for Barack Obama and then voted twice for Trump, saying he aligns more closely with the latter on the economy and immigration. He believes U.S. policy has become such that it is easier for people from far-off countries to come and stay than it is for Mexicans.

    “Why would you do that?” he said. “I mean, if I see my neighbor having a problem, he’s the first one I think I want to help. If I see somebody on the other side of the world that needs help, I don’t know.”

    Leo Martinez, who runs a binational factory and describes himself as an ultra-super-conservative Democrat, believes the U.S. needs workers but people need to come in an orderly way. “What we are doing is out of control,” he said.


    Credit:
    From left: Liz Moughon/ProPublica, Gerardo del Valle/ProPublica, Liz Moughon/ProPublica

    Another brother, David, was elected four years ago as Val Verde county attorney. The 60-year-old with graying hair is among the more progressive of his siblings. He opposed efforts to prosecute some people seeking asylum and said that as far as he’s concerned, what’s been going on at the border is not an immigration crisis. It’s “a human crisis.” And in responding to it, he said while choking back tears, “We can’t be inhuman. We can’t put our compassion aside.”

    Joe Frank, whose given name is Jose Francisco, straddles his brothers’ views. He’s pro-gun, is anti-abortion and has a son who works as a Border Patrol agent. He believes that there should be a path for people to make their case for starting new lives in the United States but that the current system is too chaotic and doesn’t move fast enough to remove those who don’t qualify.

    That position had always worked for him among voters because that’s where they seemed to be too — until the Haitian immigrants arrived.

    Unfolding Crisis

    On a chilly morning in January 2021, Martinez stood at the edge of the riverbank as a rescue boat brought in the body of a 33-year-old Haitian woman. She wore red tennis shoes and blue and white basketball shorts. Her shirt was pushed above her bulging belly. The woman, who drowned while trying to reach Del Rio, had carried twin babies nearly to term.

    Martinez was shaken by the loss of three lives all at once. He felt people either didn’t know or didn’t care what was going on at the border.

    He began capturing photos on his phone of the crisis he saw unfolding before him: parents with their babies struggling to wade through the Rio Grande and other immigrants who were not lucky enough to survive the river’s currents. There were also the images of a human smuggler who was arrested three times after she kept getting released, young girls traveling alone and a high-speed chase that left eight immigrants dead.

    In the months that followed, Border Patrol encounters in the Del Rio sector, which stretches 245 miles along the Rio Grande through Val Verde and two other border counties, doubled from 11,000 that January to nearly 22,000 in April 2021. Frustrated, Martinez wrote his first-ever opinion piece, for USA Today. In it, he called on Washington politicians to visit his county rather than just pass through for a photo opportunity, and he pleaded with them to put their egos aside and pass comprehensive immigration reform.

    “If they could stay a few days and see the madness and mayhem going on right now, there’d be no more wasting time trying to decide whether the border situation is a ‘crisis’ or not,” he wrote. “If they could have witnessed my deputies pull a full-term pregnant woman’s body out of the Rio Grande, maybe they could put their differences aside.”

    It wasn’t just a humanitarian issue, Martinez explained in an interview on Fox News that month. It was a resource issue. “When I have four deputies working, and three of them are tied up for the majority part of the day, we can’t serve our citizens and our community the way we need to be serving them,” he told the cable news network.

    Joe Frank Martinez appeared on Fox News in April 2021 to talk about the resource constraints his sheriff’s office was experiencing.


    Credit:
    Via Fox News

    No Washington decision-makers visited. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, however, seized the moment. A loyal Trump supporter and one of Biden’s fiercest critics, Abbott traveled to Del Rio that June to hold a border security summit. He praised Martinez, saying he appreciated “all that he and every man and woman involved in law enforcement are doing, especially to step up and help secure our border.”

    The governor described what was happening as an invasion. He then announced that the state would build its own wall and arrest immigrants for trespassing as part of Operation Lone Star, a multibillion-dollar state initiative he’d launched earlier that year. “We are going to do everything we can to secure the border,” Abbott said to a boisterous crowd, “and it begins immediately today right here in Val Verde County.”

    But three months later, little had changed.

    Immigrants started to arrive in Del Rio by the hundreds, then by the thousands. Instead of being processed and leaving the city almost as soon as they arrived, as they typically did, they waited with Border Patrol-issued color-coded raffle-like tickets for the opportunity to turn themselves over to federal authorities so they could request legal protections, including asylum.

    They lay on pieces of cardboard under makeshift tents fashioned from river cane they’d cut from the banks of the Rio Grande. Parents and their children vomited and passed out from dehydration in the triple-digit heat. There were no showers, and only about one portable toilet was available for every 140 people.

    The arrival of immigrants in September 2021 overwhelmed the Border Patrol, which directed people to wait to be processed in an area around the international bridge in Del Rio. With nowhere to sleep, many made their own huts with river cane they’d cut from the banks of the Rio Grande.


    Credit:
    Jordan Vonderhaar for The Texas Tribune

    Some Del Rio residents asked how they could help, while others called for the immediate deportation of all of the immigrants. One woman fired her revolver in the direction of a group of Haitians, claiming she had panicked.

    The swift and sudden arrival of so many immigrants also tested the Martinez family.

    When the federal government announced the temporary closure of the international bridge, Leo Martinez called the sheriff, hoping that his brother had information on how long the closure would last. Joe Frank Martinez didn’t know.

    While he waited to learn more, Leo Martinez was forced to divert U.S. deliveries of saddles through another international bridge more than 50 miles away, where the driver had to wait upwards of 12 hours to cross. The closure cost the company several thousand dollars in fuel and additional staff time.

    “We are pawns in this game that the federal government’s playing,” said Leo Martinez, a self-described ultra-super-conservative Democrat, later adding that much like in a game of chess, border residents are “the ones that you sacrifice up front.”

    The Sunday after the bridge closed, David Martinez, the county’s top attorney, was packing for a conference when he got a call from a city official. Abbott wanted police to arrest thousands of immigrants under the bridge for trespassing, and the city official asked if he would prosecute them.

    The county attorney didn’t directly say no, but his response left no doubt.

    The federal government had created the circumstances that had caused the immigrants to remain there, he told the city official. It had brought in portable toilets and provided some food and water. For police to arrest them, officials needed to make it clear they were no longer allowed on city property. Besides, the county attorney said, the crushing workload on his three-person legal team would inevitably lead to a backlog that would force immigrants to stay in detention longer than is legal. Without proper notice, “I would have been violating people’s constitutional rights by the thousands, and I wasn’t willing to do it.”

    Val Verde County Attorney David Martinez believes immigrants continue to play an important role in the country. “We’re here because of a country that was more accepting of immigrants and I think that a lot of people in our country, if they truly look at their roots and are honest with themselves, would have to come to the same conclusion.”


    Credit:
    From left: Mauricio Rodriguez Pons/ProPublica, Liz Moughon/ProPublica, Liz Moughon/ProPublica

    Two days later, Abbott was back in Del Rio, where he accused Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris of “promoting and allowing open-border policies.” He touted the arrests of immigrants under his state initiative, one that counted work that had nothing to do with the border as part of its metrics for success.

    The sheriff stood behind him.

    Losing Ground

    While on his way to a doctor’s appointment last fall, Joe Frank Martinez got a call from an unknown number. It was a Republican operative inviting him to run on behalf of the other team.

    The state’s Republican leaders, including its two U.S. senators, loved him, Martinez recalled the operative telling him. He’d taken positions as conservative as theirs on the issues they cared most about. If he agreed to switch parties, the political action committee would cover his filing fees and help fund his campaign.

    He’d certainly had serious differences with Democrats in recent years. The party had changed in ways he didn’t like. But leaving felt too much like a dishonor, not only to his father’s memory, but to his ideals.

    He said no.

    As part of his efforts to counter the discourse around immigration, Joe Frank Martinez hit the streets, knocking on doors to ask people for their support. In a place where a few hundred votes can make a difference, he knew turnout would be key.

    Shortly afterward, the PAC, known as Project Red TX, placed its support behind a 56-year-old police officer named Rogelio “Roger” Hernandez. The Republican challenger was born in Del Rio but had spent his law enforcement career in San Antonio. Hernandez said he was planning to retire and move back to the border city to be near his mom. He couldn’t recall if Project Red TX approached him or if he approached the group.

    Project Red TX began to more aggressively target border communities after Trump made gains in the traditionally Democratic strongholds during the 2020 presidential election. The group, which helps elect Republicans in local races in Latino communities, has raised more than $2.5 million. The bulk of that money comes from a political action committee whose biggest donors include Texas real estate businessmen Harlan Crow and Richard Weekley.

    This year alone, the group has spent about $370,000 on advertising for about 50 local candidates, primarily in border counties, according to campaign finance reports. Three of the candidates, including Hernandez, are in Val Verde County.

    The message seems to be resonating. This year, for the first time in decades, more people voted in the Val Verde County Republican primary than in the Democratic primary — in fact, twice as many did.

    Republican Primary Turnout is Rising in Val Verde County

    More than 2,000 people voted in Republican primaries in Val Verde County each year Donald Trump appeared on the ballot.

    Note: Presidential primary elections shown


    Credit:
    Source: Texas Secretary of State. Chart: Dan Keemahill.

    As part of his campaign to bring “order to the border,” Hernandez has promised to secure additional resources for the sheriff’s office.

    “I’ll get them better training, better equipment, better vehicles, better everything,” Hernandez said, without offering specifics on how he would meet that promise, saying only “there’s grants out there that you can get.”

    Martinez said his office has worked diligently to secure available grants, including those that are designated for border security. Altogether, Val Verde County and the city of Del Rio have received more than $13 million in state and federal grants since 2021, about half of which can be attributed to Operation Lone Star. That exceeds what they got in total the previous 13 years.

    “That individual hasn’t lived here in over 30 years, and all of a sudden he shows up in the ninth inning. Come on, give me a break,” Martinez said.

    As the race heated up this summer, Wayne Hamilton, a longtime Texas Republican operative who heads Project Red TX, posted a photo of himself and Hernandez on social media. Behind them was a stack of the candidate’s campaign signs. Hernandez was committed to border security, Hamilton wrote, then added, “The incumbent Sheriff was featured in a documentary helping migrants enter the country illegally. It’s time for change.”

    Hamilton declined multiple interview requests and did not reply to questions about the race or about which documentary he was referring to. News footage from the 2021 immigration spike shows Martinez extending his hand to help people in the Rio Grande, who had already reached the U.S., safely onto land. He then turned those immigrants over to Border Patrol.

    During the summer of 2021, a Fox News camera captured the moment when Joe Frank Martinez helped pull immigrants already in the United States out of the Rio Grande. Republicans later used the image to accuse him of helping people enter the country illegally.


    Credit:
    Via Fox News

    “Once you are in the United States, in the middle of that river, I’ve got to protect you,” Martinez said, questioning what people would have said if he hadn’t done so and one of the immigrants had drowned. “It’s a human being at the end of the day.”

    The attacks are particularly upsetting for Martinez, who prides himself on having friends from the right and left. Among Martinez’s backers is the Republican sheriff he beat in 2008. “It’s about relationships, something I’ve been building since 1977,” he said.

    Some of those relationships turned out to be more fragile than Martinez was aware.

    On a recent afternoon in mid-September, Mary Fritz, a fourth-generation rancher and Trump supporter, picked up a sign for his opponent during a meet-and-greet at a local burger restaurant.

    Fritz, a petite 62-year-old with weathered skin, and Martinez have been friends for about four decades. She has voted for him every time — even against Republicans.

    He’s a good sheriff, Fritz says. She appreciates how he’s readily available and out in the community where constituents can talk to him and voice their concerns. “I just wish he would have pressed the border issue more,” Fritz said as she walked on a patch of the 2,000 acres of desert scrubland that abuts the Rio Grande where her family raises sheep and goats.

    Martinez didn’t hold back his frustration. If voters were willing to disregard his decades of service and judge him on something he had no control over, “God bless them.”

    Joe Frank Martinez patrols in Val Verde County, a sprawling rural territory three times the size of Rhode Island that shares 110 miles of border with Mexico.


    Credit:
    Liz Moughon/ProPublica

    Broken System

    When politicians, government bureaucrats or reporters come to Del Rio and ask the sheriff to show them whether the billions of dollars spent by successive presidents have made the border more secure, he piles them into his white Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck and drives them down to the so-called wall so that they can see for themselves.

    “All this right here,” Martinez says, pointing to an expanse of land where ranches once stood about a mile north of the Rio Grande, “used to be little ranchitos that went all the way to the river. I think the U.S. government made something like 13 millionaires when they purchased all this property.”

    In their place, there is now a jumble of fencing.

    The black wrought iron panels about 14 feet tall were erected during the administration of former President George W. Bush, who was trying to funnel immigrants into areas where Border Patrol could more easily catch them. Martinez thinks those worked.

    The Trump administration tore down some of them to build sections twice as high of the “big, beautiful wall” he promised voters. But Trump left office before completing the project. Biden then came in and immediately paused construction, pledging to not build “another foot” of wall. In Del Rio, that meant that workers left stacks of construction materials behind and gaps between the panels of fencing wide enough for tractor-trailers to drive through them. The Biden administration attempted to close those gaps by hanging flimsy wire mesh that is already sagging in some areas from people climbing over it.

    An area west of the port of entry in Del Rio where multiple administrations have built and torn down panels of fencing. On the left are parts of the 14-foot-tall fence erected under George W. Bush. On the right are taller bollards built under Donald Trump. Pieces of the fence are connected with mesh put in place during Joe Biden’s administration.

    For Martinez, all of this reflects a political system bent on fighting over border security rather than achieving it.

    “Do we really have a system that’s broken, or do we have a political machine that’s broken?” he said. “The far right is pushing and the far left is trying to push back, but what happened to working together?”

    Answering his own question, he later said, “We’re going to continue with this mess probably long after I’m dead and gone.”

    Correction

    Nov. 2, 2024: This story originally misstated the direction that Del Rio is from San Antonio. It is west, not south.

    Update, Nov. 6, 2024: Joe Frank Martinez was reelected as sheriff of Val Verde County on Tuesday. His support likely included crossover Republican voters as the county tipped strongly for Donald Trump.

    Gerardo del Valle of ProPublica contributed reporting. Dan Keemahill of ProPublica and The Texas Tribune contributed data reporting and research. Lexi Churchill of ProPublica and The Texas Tribune contributed research.

  • Cómo la inmigración cambió Del Río, Texas — ProPublica

    Este video está publicado en colaboración con The Texas Tribune, una sala de redacción local sin fines de lucro y no partidista que informa e interactúa con los tejanos. Regístrese en The Brief Weekly para ponerse al día sobre su cobertura esencial de los problemas de Texas.

    El sheriff Joe Frank Martínez ha cumplido cuatro mandatos como máximo funcionario encargado de hacer cumplir la ley en el condado de Val Verde, Texas, un extenso territorio rural que comparte 110 millas de frontera con México. Es un puesto que su padre soñaba con ocupar antes de morir a la edad de 51 años. Martínez dice que su padre, un demócrata acérrimo, lo crió a él y a sus nueve hermanos para servir a su comunidad.

    Martínez se describe a sí mismo como “católico, provida y proarmas”. También está comprometido con el partido de su padre. Sus relaciones en el condado de Val Verde lo han impulsado repetidamente a ocupar el cargo, gracias al apoyo tanto de demócratas como de republicanos. Pero este año, la victoria de Martínez es menos segura porque algunos en el condado de Val Verde no creen que sea lo suficientemente duro con la inmigración, aunque asegurar la frontera no es responsabilidad del sheriff local.

    Este breve documental sigue a Joe Frank, junto con sus hermanos David y Leo Martínez, mientras luchan con las tensiones en torno a la inmigración en Del Río, casi tres horas al oeste de San Antonio. La candidatura de Martínez a la presidencia ofrece una idea de cómo los nuevos patrones de inmigración a lo largo de la frontera entre Estados Unidos y México han coincidido, si no impulsados, con actitudes cambiantes entre los votantes que viven allí. Algunas comunidades que alguna vez fueron consideradas bastiones demócratas han comenzado a tornarse rojas, una tendencia impulsada por los esfuerzos republicanos por cortejar a los votantes latinos.

    Esos esfuerzos están cambiando la política en el condado de Val Verde. Un comité de acción política llamado Proyecto Red TX ha respaldado a un candidato llamado Rogelio “Roger” Hernández para competir contra Martínez. Desde 2018, el PAC ha estado reclutando y apoyando financieramente a candidatos republicanos en contiendas locales en condados fronterizos de mayoría latina. Este año, ha respaldado a 50 candidatos locales, incluidos tres del condado de Val Verde. Los carteles de Hernández han aparecido por toda la ciudad, con su lema de “poner orden en la frontera”.

    A medida que las ciudades fronterizas se conviertan en el telón de fondo de un debate nacional sobre inmigración, ¿cómo afectará esto a Del Río? Mire este cortometraje urgente presentado por ProPublica, en asociación con The Texas Tribune, y profundice leyendo esta historia.

    Corrección

    2 de noviembre de 2024: Esta historia originalmente indicaba erróneamente que Del Río es de San Antonio. Es el oeste, no el sur.

    Lisa Riordan Sevilla, Mauricio Rodríguez Pons, Liz Moughon y Katie Campbell contribuyeron a la producción.

    Actualización, 12 de noviembre de 2024: Joe Frank Martínez fue reelegido como sheriff del condado de Val Verde el 5 de noviembre. Su apoyo probablemente incluyó a votantes republicanos cruzados, ya que el condado se inclinaba fuertemente por Donald Trump.

  • What We Learn From the Texas Town That Voted for Abortion and for Trump



    Politics


    /
    November 14, 2024

    The right to abortion won big this election—and so did the man who ended Roe v. Wade. Nowhere was that contradiction more pronounced than in Amarillo, Texas.

    Abortion-rights activist Harper Metcalf hods up a sign reading "Vote Against Prop A" and "Protect Personal Privacy" while sitting in the bed of a truck.
    Harper Metcalf, an abortion-rights organizer, hold a sign opposing Proposition A.(Amy Littlefield)

    Amarillo, Tex.—In the Texas panhandle city of Amarillo on Election Day, in the buckle of the Bible Belt, Dexie Organ, 60, dressed in black leggings and a red shirt, stepped out of her beat-up Nissan and headed across the parking lot to vote. On her way, she saw a volunteer holding a sign that read: “Vote No on Prop A.” Organ stopped. “I need a little education,” she told the sign-holder, Diann Anderson, who explained to her that Proposition A was an abortion travel ban that would deputize private citizens to sue anyone they suspected of helping someone travel through Amarillo to get an abortion out of state. “I do believe that is unconstitutional,” Organ told me. “We’re women; I don’t know why they think they need to suppress us.” Organ told me she has 14 children—and she’s had an abortion. “I have eight daughters…and I want them to have what they want,” she told me.

    So Organ went inside and cast her ballot against the ordinance—and in favor of Donald Trump.

    Across the country, a critical mass of voters made this seemingly contradictory choice along with Organ: The same electorate that voted for abortion rights in seven out of the 10 states where they were on the ballot also voted to return Trump, the man responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade, to office. Abortion rights ballot initiatives won alongside the most conservative of Republicans, like Senator Josh Hawley in Missouri and Tim Sheehy in Montana. Even in Florida, the high-stakes abortion rights ballot initiative won 57 percent of the vote, making it one point more popular than Trump himself; it failed only because Florida has a 60 percent threshold for an amendment to pass, higher than almost any other state. The right to abortion won big this election, yet so did the party that ended that right. Nowhere was the contradiction starker than right here in Amarillo, where the two counties spanning the city went for Trump by 72 and 80 percent, yet a resounding 59 percent of voters defeated an initiative that, among other provisions, sought to create civil penalties for anyone who helps an Amarillo resident travel for an abortion, end the disposal of fetal remains in the city, and revive the 1873 Comstock Act, which bans the mailing of abortion medication.

    Dexie Organ had her reasons—including doubts about Kamala Harris.

    “I would like to see a woman president, but I just don’t think she’s the one,” she told me. “She’s not strong enough to lead. We’ve got all these foreign wars going on and the men in the other leadership roles in our world would just annihilate us.”

    Plus, Organ was struggling economically, she told me, waiting tables and breeding dogs on top of her job as a certified nurse midwife.

    “Our country’s in ruins, financially,” she said, and she believed Trump would help.

    But the heart of the contradiction is this: She saw Trump’s position on abortion as acceptable because “he gave it to the states”—including her state, where abortion is banned. Trump had convinced Organ and perhaps millions like her that he did not pose a threat to their daughters. White women like Organ, a majority of whom voted for Trump, were willing to go along with Trump’s racism and misogyny, in part because he had convinced them his position on abortion was a moderate one. As for the Amarillo activists who managed to resoundingly defeat an anti-abortion initiative in the heart of Trump country? They won because they managed to convince voters that their cause was a conservative one.

    Current Issue

    Cover of November 2024 Issue

    The pro-choice signs I saw at the polling place in Amarillo could have come from the National Rifle Association or the Libertarian Party. “Say no to government overreach,” read one. “Defend our Constitution. Vote against Prop A,” read another. I noticed the same message emblazoned on a white sheriff’s SUV nearby: “Randall County Sheriff. Defending the Constitution.” An organizer against Prop A joked with The New Yorker’s Rachel Monroe about “the conservative hanger”—a door hanger that read “Protect Your Rights” with an eagle and a quotation from (virulently anti-abortion) Governor Greg Abbott that read: “If you want to start a fight with Texans, just try taking away their freedom.”

    “We are continuing to find that, regardless of political affiliation, the majority of Amarillo wants to reject this extremist ordinance,” Lindsay London, a nurse and cofounder of Amarillo for Reproductive Freedom Alliance told me as we stood in the parking lot. “They find it to be government overreach, a violation of privacy and freedom.”

    The “government overreach” line was so effective that supporters of the anti-abortion ordinance were coopting it, shouting: “Stop government overreach! Vote for Prop A!”

    The attempt to frame abortion rights as a conservative issue dates back to at least 1986 when pro-choice campaigners used messaging against government interference to defeat an anti-abortion ballot initiative in Arkansas, as Will Saletan wrote in his book Bearing Right. It’s been recycled across the country again and again. In Missouri, the successful campaign to enshrine a right to abortion until viability in the state constitution was called Missourians for Constitutional Freedom. Kansans used the same name to defeat an anti-abortion initiative there in 2022, and as I wrote then, some voters were so confused by the name they weren’t sure at first which side of the issue the canvassers were on. This year, a spokesperson for Arizona’s successful abortion rights ballot initiative campaign told The New Yorker they were counting on Republican voters for whom the issue “goes in conjunction with their conservative values—they don’t want the government in the doctor’s office with them.” As I reported, Floridians Protecting Freedom sought to peg that state’s six-week ban to the unpopular “government overreach” that angered Floridians during the Covid pandemic. “Do not attack Republicans (including DeSantis or Trump) directly,” internal guidance sent to supporters by the campaign urged. “Instead, refer to ‘extreme politicians’ who banned abortion.”

    So is it any wonder that voters like Dexie Organ felt they had permission to vote for abortion and Republicans? Campaigns like the one in Amarillo had met voters where they were, allowing them to vote against anti-abortion restrictions in a way that felt consistent with their conservative values. Perhaps, at least here in the Bible Belt, it was the only way to win. And it had worked—on voters like Bailey Odom, 22, a redhead with a ponytail who voted against the anti-abortion ordinance because she felt traveling to get an abortion should be a matter of “personal opinion,” and because her mom had cautioned her that the initiative would create “a whole bunch of snitches” who could file lawsuits to enforce it. “If you want to travel out to do it, that’s what you’ve really got to do, then go ahead,” she said. Odom voted for Trump because “the economy is crap,” as did her dad, Brandon, who voted against the anti-abortion ordinance because “my wife told me to.” Keith Morris, 51, voted against the anti-abortion ordinance and for the libertarian presidential candidate. “A lot of people here have forgotten what being Texan is all about,” he told me. “One thing that being Texan means: You don’t like people in your business, telling you what to do.”

    Trump, of course, will now be able to tell us all what to do when it comes to abortion. He could fulfill the promise of Project 2025 and invoke the 1873 Comstock Act to ban the mailing of abortion drugs nationwide, including in the very states that voted to protect abortion rights. The revival of Comstock has become the pet project of Mark Lee Dickson, whose “sanctuary city for the unborn” initiatives have passed in eight counties and 69 cities. Amarillo was Dickson’s latest battleground. After the city council rejected Dickson’s ordinance to empower private citizens to sue anyone who helped someone travel through the city to get an abortion out of state, Dickson and his supporters gathered signatures to put the issue before voters on Election Day. Dickson looked somber Tuesday night as he addressed a few dozen supporters gathered in a local church. “We’ve got to be honest. What happened?” Dickson said. “What happened in Amarillo, Texas?”

    The answers to this question were dancing their hearts out in a burger bar across town. The women who had defeated Dickson cheered and threw their arms in the air. Harper Metcalf stood under the glow of the fairy lights and sparkly Texas flag streamers, eyes shining. I’d met her earlier in the day as she sat in her pickup truck outside the polling place with a sign that read “Vote no on Prop A.” She’d been organizing against Dickson for over a year. Now, she seemed to be radiating joy. “How do you feel?” I asked and she looked me in the eye and whispered: “I don’t know if I’ve ever been this happy.” Behind her a TV screen over the bar was tuned to MSNBC. Trump was going to win.

    I took a breath and held Metcalf’s joy like a life vest. There would be so much to reckon with in the days and the weeks and the years to come. Soon, data would show what was already becoming clear: that about three in 10 voters in Arizona, Missouri, and Nevada who supported abortion rights ballot measures also voted for Trump. I knew as I stood in that bar that we’d spend years parsing how these initiatives had succeeded where Democrats had failed. One answer is that these campaigns had siloed “reproductive freedom” off the rest of the progressive agenda. They had proven abortion could win in isolation, even in red states, but that these wins would not translate into victories for Democrats. Kamala Harris had failed to articulate a winning economic message that connected reproductive freedom with a sense that Democrats would help struggling people raise the families they did want. Against the backdrop of a loss that felt bottomless, I tried, for a moment, to find the hope.

    “A victory is a milestone on the road, evidence that sometimes we win and encouragement to keep going, not to stop,” the author Rebecca Solnit wrote. Her book Hope in the Dark got me through Trump’s first presidency. Victory, she wrote, “is something that has arrived in innumerable ways, small and large and often incremental, but not in that way that was widely described and expected. So victories slip by unheralded. Failures are more readily detected.” I watched Lindsay London leap into the air, throwing her fist over her head. Soak it up, I told myself. You are going to need this feeling. There would be time, later, to count the cards, and face the long fight ahead. There would be time, in every small corner of victory across the country, from Missouri to Amarillo, to rethink the strategy, to consider what winning had cost. But tonight, just for tonight, they were going to revel in their joy.

    We cannot back down

    We now confront a second Trump presidency.

    There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

    Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

    Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

    The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

    I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

    Onwards,

    Katrina vanden Heuvel
    Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

    Amy Littlefield

    Amy Littlefield is The Nation’s abortion access correspondent and a journalist who focuses on reproductive rights, healthcare, and religion. She is the author of the forthcoming book American Crusaders, a history of the anti-abortion movement over the last fifty years, to be published in 2026.

    More from The Nation

    President-elect Donald Trump arrives at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on November 13, 2024, for his meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House.

    California and the other powerful Democrat-led states will be the first line of defense under Trump’s new administration.

    Sasha Abramsky

    President Donald Trump, flanked by Senator John Thune, stops to speak to the cameras following his lunch with Senate Republicans in the Capitol on Wednesday, January 9, 2018.

    The once and future president tried to oust Thune from the Senate in 2022. Thune won another term. Now, he’s the Senate majority leader.

    John Nichols

    DJ Cassidy performs against a rural-themed backdrop at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

    The party continues to operate in an overcredentialied fever dream in the face of an America becoming ever more red in tooth and claw

    John Ganz

    Representative Dean Phillips speaks to supporters during a campaign rally on January 22, 2024.

    A conversation with former Biden primary challenger Representative Phillips on the election, his run for presidency, and the future of the party.

    StudentNation

    /

    Owen Dahlkamp

    Marco Rubio speaks during the second day of the 2024 Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 16, 2024.

    Democrats are falling over themselves to hail Marco Rubio’s nomination as secretary of state.

    Aída Chávez


  • Trump arrasa en casi todos los condados fronterizos de Texas – ProPublica

    Los demócratas de Texas han considerado durante mucho tiempo a la creciente población latina del estado como su boleto para eventualmente romper con el dominio del Partido Republicano. El martes por la noche, sin embargo, demostró que el Partido Republicano ha logrado avances significativos en el proceso de alejar a esos votantes, y en ninguna parte eso fue más evidente que a lo largo de la frontera.

    Después de años de perder el voto latino en todo el estado por dos dígitos, los republicanos establecieron un punto máximo con Donald Trump capturando el 55% del bloque electoral crítico, superando el 44% de la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris, según las encuestas a pie de urna.

    En los bastiones tradicionalmente demócratas a lo largo de la frontera, Trump casi arrasó.

    Ganó 14 de los 18 condados dentro de 20 millas de la frontera, una cifra que duplicó su llamativa actuación de 2020 en la región de mayoría latina. Ganó en los cuatro condados del Valle del Río Grande sólo ocho años después de atraer apenas el 29% de la región, una hazaña que incluyó entregar el 97% de latinos del condado de Starr a los republicanos. por primera vez desde 1896. Y, aunque perdió El Paso, uno de los condados más poblados de la frontera, redujo los márgenes allí de una manera que no se había visto en décadas.

    Los condados a lo largo de la frontera continúan cambiando

    Trump fue el que obtuvo más votos en la mayoría de los condados a lo largo de la frontera entre Texas y México en 2024. Esto continúa la tendencia de que los condados fronterizos voten de manera más conservadora en las elecciones presidenciales. Se muestra cuántos condados han votado por el candidato de cada partido en cada contienda desde 1996.


    Nota: Resultados no oficiales de 2024.


    Crédito:
    Fuente: Secretario de Estado de Texas. Mapa: Dan Keemahill/ProPublica y The Texas Tribune.

    Sus avances a lo largo de la frontera fueron los mayores para un candidato presidencial republicano en al menos 30 años, superando incluso los avances logrados por el nativo de Texas George W. Bush en 2004.

    El éxito de Trump en atraer a comunidades predominantemente latinas fue evidente en todo el país cuando se convirtió en el primer candidato presidencial republicano en ganar el condado de Miami-Dade en más de tres décadas y casi duplicó su participación en el voto latino en Pensilvania, incluso después de que un comediante en un En sus mítines llamó a Puerto Rico una “isla flotante de basura”. Pero el desempeño de Trump es particularmente sorprendente en Texas, donde los demócratas prácticamente han atado su destino a la idea de que, mientras el electorado latino del estado siguiera creciendo y se mantuviera confiablemente azul, los republicanos algún día dejarían de ganar elecciones estatales.

    Además de dominar la carrera presidencial, los republicanos obtuvieron otros avances a lo largo de la frontera. La representante federal Mónica De La Cruz, republicana de Edinburg, mantuvo un escaño clave del Partido Republicano anclado en el Valle del Río Grande, y los republicanos consiguieron un escaño en el Senado estatal y dos distritos de la Cámara de Representantes estatales en el sur de Texas que anteriormente estaban en manos de los demócratas. El senador estadounidense Ted Cruz, quien ganó la reelección con una mayoría de votantes latinos, dijo que los resultados equivalían a un “cambio generacional”.

    Los demócratas vieron sus propios puntos positivos. Eddie Morales Jr., representante estatal de un extenso distrito fronterizo que se extiende desde Eagle Pass hasta El Paso, mantuvo su escaño el martes, aunque logró una victoria por poco dos años después de ganar por un margen más cómodo de 12 puntos. El representante estadounidense Henry Cuellar, un demócrata de Laredo, también ganó por un margen inesperadamente estrecho de alrededor de 5 puntos porcentuales contra un rival republicano a quien gastó mucho más.

    Joshua Blank, director de investigación del Proyecto de Política de Texas de la Universidad de Texas en Austin, dijo que es demasiado pronto para decir si los avances republicanos se mantendrán o se extenderán más allá del propio Trump. Pero, dijo Blank, los demócratas harían bien en preocuparse por la posibilidad de que este cambio perdure.

    El éxito de Trump entre los votantes latinos pareció surgir de la comprensión de que, en lugares como Texas, muchos latinos “se consideran multirraciales” y han crecido en comunidades donde la raza y el origen étnico no son una prioridad, dijo Blank. Trump apuntó a los hombres hispanos que rara vez votan apelando “a sus bolsillos, a su masculinidad, a su lugar en la cultura y la sociedad, pero no directamente a una identidad como minoría racial y étnica”.

    “¿Eso significa que estos votantes van a permanecer en la columna republicana? No lo sabemos. ¿Significa que van a apoyar a alguien que no se llama Donald Trump? No está claro”, dijo Blank. “Pero ha cambiado los términos del debate de una manera que creo que los demócratas se sienten incómodos”.

    Los condados fronterizos hacen un giro hacia la derecha hacia Trump

    Nueve condados dentro de un radio de 20 millas de la frontera entre Texas y México pasaron de apoyar a la demócrata Hillary Clinton en 2016 al republicano Donald Trump en 2024.

    Nota: Resultados no oficiales de 2024.


    Crédito:
    Fuente: Secretario de Estado de Texas. Gráfico: Dan Keemahill/ProPublica y The Texas Tribune

    De manera similar a su atractivo entre otros electores, Trump se ganó a los votantes latinos al criticar a Harris por los desafíos económicos que muchos de ellos, con razón y sin ella, culpan al presidente Joe Biden.

    Jerónimo Cortina, profesor de ciencias políticas de la Universidad de Houston, dijo que el desafío de Trump ahora sería cumplir sus promesas de mejorar la suerte económica de los votantes. Y dijo que esperaría que los votantes responsabilicen a Trump si no lo hace. Cortina señaló que muchos latinos apoyaron la reelección de Bush en 2004, sólo para abandonar el Partido Republicano en favor del demócrata Barack Obama en 2008 en medio de una economía en crisis.

    “Los realineamientos ocurren cuando hay un cambio sostenible, y en este momento no está claro que lo tengamos”, dijo Cortina.

    También dijo que sería prematuro decir si el atractivo de Trump (por no hablar del Partido Republicano) fue algo más que fugaz porque, en las elecciones locales, los latinos todavía tendían a preferir a los demócratas.

    Un ejemplo de ello es la carrera por el cargo de sheriff en el condado de Val Verde, a casi tres horas al oeste de San Antonio.

    En esa carrera, el demócrata Joe Frank Martínez mantuvo su escaño, venciendo a su rival republicano después de recibir el 57% de los votos, incluso cuando Trump ganó el condado con el 63% de los votos.

    Según Martínez, Project Red TX, un PAC respaldado por el Partido Republicano, inicialmente intentó que cambiara de partido. Cuando se negó, el PAC respaldó a su oponente, quien llevó a cabo una campaña centrada en el tema de la inmigración, aunque eso no es parte del trabajo del sheriff.

    Este año, el grupo apoyó a más de 50 candidatos locales, principalmente en condados fronterizos. Los tres candidatos que respaldó en el condado de Val Verde perdieron, aunque Wayne Hamilton, un veterano agente republicano que encabeza el grupo, señaló que también apoyó a varios candidatos locales que ganaron sus elecciones y Trump llevó al condado a la cima de la boleta electoral. Uno de esos casos fue el del condado de Jim Wells, donde Trump recibió el 57% y el sheriff demócrata fue derrocado por poco por un rival republicano.

    Hamilton dijo que los votantes latinos que viven en la frontera o cerca de ella acudieron en masa a Trump por lo que ven como el “colapso en la aplicación de la ley fronteriza y el fracaso de la administración Biden en hacer su trabajo” al impedir que más inmigrantes crucen a Texas.

    Un número récord de llegadas desbordó la infraestructura fronteriza en numerosas comunidades. A Val Verde, unos 20.000 inmigrantes, en su mayoría haitianos, llegaron casi a la vez en 2021, lo que obligó a los funcionarios a cerrar el puerto de entrada internacional mientras averiguaban cómo responder a la situación.

    La protesta pública fue más aguda, dijo Hamilton, en los condados con altas tasas de pobreza donde los residentes tenían más probabilidades de sentir que su comunidad estaba “siendo invadida por personas que son aún más pobres, con necesidades aún mayores”.

    Hamilton celebró que Trump superó a Starr por 16 puntos este año, un cambio de 76 puntos desde su déficit de 60 puntos allí en 2016.

    Sin embargo, en las elecciones los demócratas, incluido el sheriff en ejercicio, lograron mantener sus posiciones a pesar de las campañas agresivas del lado republicano. “Todos los candidatos que se presentaron como demócratas ganaron, por lo que la presidencia de Trump es básicamente un escaño aislado”, dijo la presidenta demócrata del condado de Starr, Jessica Vera.

    Aún así, dijo, si los demócratas a nivel nacional y estatal quieren mantener el condado azul, deben trabajar junto con los líderes locales para conectarse con los votantes allí.

    Hamilton dijo que algunos votantes de Trump recién convertidos podrían sentirse menos inclinados a votar en contra de sus funcionarios demócratas locales, especialmente en los condados fronterizos más pequeños, porque tienden a ser conocidos en la comunidad.

    “Cuanto más avanzas en la boleta, todo se vuelve más personal”, dijo Hamilton. “No es un chico que veo en la televisión, ¿verdad? Es el chico con el que voy a misa”.

    Los funcionarios locales del Partido Demócrata, incluida Sylvia Bruni en el condado de Webb, un antiguo bastión demócrata, dijeron que habían advertido a sus sedes estatales y nacionales sobre los avances que los republicanos estaban logrando en sus distritos. Pero dijo que había recibido poco apoyo y que, en cambio, tuvo que depender casi por completo de los fondos que su grupo pudo recaudar por sí solo.

    Esto no será suficiente en el futuro, afirmó Bruni. “Necesitamos ayuda”.

  • Cum să urmărești Samford Bulldogs vs Texas So. Tigri: informații despre fluxul live de baschet NCAA, canal TV, ora de începere, cote de joc

    Cine joacă

    Texas Deci. Tigrii @ Samford Bulldogs

    Înregistrări curente: Texas So. 1-3, Samford 3-1

    Cum să vizionezi

    Ce să știți

    Samford Bulldogs se vor confrunta cu Texas So. Tigrii la 3:00 pm ET duminică la Pete Hanna Center. Bulldogs vor căuta să-și păstreze în viață seria de 20 de victorii pe teren propriu, care datează din sezonul trecut.

    Vineri, Samford a avut nevoie de puțin timp suplimentar pentru a pune deoparte N. Alabama. Într-un joc strâns care ar fi putut merge în orice direcție, ei au reușit cu o victorie cu 97-96 în fața Lions. După ce au crescut scorul atât de mare, ambele echipe ar putea face niște exerciții suplimentare defensive foarte curând.

    Între timp, Texas So. era de așteptat să treacă greu marți și, ei bine, au făcut-o. Au căzut victimele unei înfrângeri dureroase cu 81-62 în mâinile lui Georgia Tech. Tigrii au fost într-o poziție grea după prima repriză, scorul fiind deja la 49-25.

    Pierderea nu spune totuși întreaga poveste, deoarece mai mulți jucători au avut jocuri bune. Unul dintre cei mai activi a fost Duane Posey, care a mers 6 pentru 9 în drum spre 15 puncte plus șase recuperări și două furări. Performanța sa a compensat un meci mai lent împotriva Georgiei duminică.

    Victoria lui Samford le-a crescut recordul la 3-1. În ceea ce privește Texas So., aceasta este a doua înfrângere la rând pentru ei și le reduce recordul sezonului la 1-3.

    Rebounding-ul este probabil să fie un factor important în acest concurs: Samford s-a prăbușit în acest sezon, având o medie de 47,7 recuperări pe joc. Cu toate acestea, nu este ca Texas So. lupte în acel departament, deoarece au avut o medie de 37,2. În timp ce ambele echipe se luptă pentru a înghesui loviturile ratate, vom vedea dacă o echipă poate lua un avantaj.

    Totul a mers pe calea lui Samford împotriva lui Texas So. în meciul lor precedent din decembrie 2023, când Samford a reușit cu o victorie cu 87-65. În acel concurs, Samford a acumulat un avantaj la pauză de 41-21, o performanță impresionantă pe care vor încerca să o repete duminică.

    Istoria seriei

    Samford a câștigat ambele jocuri pe care le-a jucat împotriva lui Texas So. in ultimii 2 ani.

    • 21 decembrie 2023 – Samford 87 vs Texas So. 65
    • 20 noiembrie 2022 – Samford 78 vs. Texas So. 63