Tag: problem

  • A High School Teacher Went Viral For Talking About How Young Boys Not Facing Pushback Is A Serious Problem

    Note: Discussions of rape.

    Among the many questions plaguing teachers today, most recently, I can’t stop coming across one: What is going on with the boys?

    In a viral TikTok, which has over one million views and over 11,000 comments, Austin (@awillmakeit), a high school world history teacher from the south, urges that the behavior he sees from adolescent boys in his classroom has become increasingly troubling, and in the current climate without pushback or consequences, it’s only going to get worse.

    A person in a patterned shirt discusses the need for better teaching approaches for high school boys and acknowledges recent failures in this area

    “As a high school teacher, this last week has really shown me that we are failing our boys pretty hard,” he began in his video.

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    “As the last line of defense before these kids get into adulthood, I really do feel like a part of our job is making sure that these kids are socialized and that they are respectful of just being in public when they graduate,” he continued. “But what we’re seeing is 18 to 25-year-old men who are completely unsocialized, who are lonely, who are honestly, incredibly crass.”

    Person speaking in a video titled "Yap session about High School Boys" discussing the socialization of young men. Posters visible in the background

    Austin explained that his students make blatantly unfunny jokes where the “punchline” is just rape, death, murder, racism, or harm.

    Person discussing how men in teaching can improve, with text overlay regarding a session on high school boys. Posters seen in the background

    Person discussing how men in teaching can improve, with text overlay regarding a session on high school boys. Posters seen in the background

    Person in a room discussing teaching improvement for high school boys, gesturing with hands. Posters visible in the background

    Person in a room discussing teaching improvement for high school boys, gesturing with hands. Posters visible in the background

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    “Like, that’s the punchline,” he said. “That’s the purpose of the joke, is that, ‘Isn’t this a funny joke because it’s racist, because it’s about rape? Because it’s this crazy thing that we’re not allowed to talk about?”

    Austin asked, “And where’s that starting? Where do they get in their head that this is something that they are OK to do out in public just openly?” before panning to his classroom. “Here. This is where it happens.”

      @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    Austin explained that in the classroom, boys aren’t facing enough resistance for their extremely crude jokes and behavior, which only allows the behavior to continue. “What I’m noticing is that these kids aren’t facing pushback,” he said. “They’re not facing pushback when they make seriously unfunny jokes. And when I say unfunny, I’m trying not to be subjective about it.”

    Person speaking in a classroom with posters behind, discussing a session on improving how men teach high school boys

    “I’m really trying to point out that, like the joke is rape, the joke is death. Like, it’s not a joke. It’s it’s at the expense of somebody [else] who, as a teenage boy, you don’t experience it. You aren’t afraid of it. You’re not a girl walking home alone at 10 p.m. in the dark wondering if you’re gonna even make it home.”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    Austin said they’ll make these jokes in the classroom, in hallways, and even with teachers nearby. But when he, as a teacher, pushes back against it, they get defensive or angrier.

    He said, “When I, as a teacher, say something to them and go, ‘Hey, what the hell are you doing? Like, why, what’s happening in your brain right now?’ They don’t have an answer. They don’t even seem to recognize why I’m even questioning them.”

    One recent incident, which Austin described as his “breaking point” that led him to make his now-viral video, occurred when a student openly made a rape joke in his presence while walking through the hallway.

    Person in a classroom looks serious under a caption about improving education for high school boys. Text reads "what's funny about rape."

    “I just stopped, and I go, ‘What’s funny about that? What’s funny about it, bud? What’s funny about rape? What’s so ‘ha ha’ about rape? What’s so freaking hilarious about your friend being raped?’” Austin said the boy then stared at him, gave him some attitude, and flipped him off.

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    To combat the problem, Austin said boys need more pushback and possibly even a little public shaming to know that this behavior is not OK. Austin explained, “These kids need to be shamed. And I know that’s not something that we really talk about, but the idea of public shaming has always been a thing that humans have done to make sure that social stuff works.” Perhaps you can think of it like when Tim Walz started calling conservatives “weird” for policing women’s bodies.

    Man with glasses speaking passionately in a classroom. Caption discusses men teaching high school boys better; text includes a controversial opinion

    Austin continued, “Right now, we’re not shaming these boys. We’re not shaming them; they don’t experience shame. They feel like they can do and say whatever they want.”

    Person discussing male behavior and teaching on video call. Text discusses men needing improvement in education

    “They can show up to class 20 minutes late. They can flick a teacher off. They can curse at you, and they feel this way. They feel emboldened, and right now, especially, they feel like no consequences are coming their way. That’s where we need to change.”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    In the last part of his video, Austin reiterated that his message is really for other male teachers out there who have the opportunity to set an example for this generation of boys. “It is our responsibility to show them what being a man looks like, what being a man actually pertains to,” he urged.

    Person with glasses in a casual polka-dot shirt discusses men's roles in teaching high school boys

    Austin added, “It’s not making crass jokes; it’s not making girls feel bad; it’s not laughing at people when they’re down. It’s being helpful. It’s building people up. It’s about being supportive. It’s about being a rock when somebody needs it. None of these boys are prepared for that. None of these boys are living a life right now where that’s where they’re going.”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    “It’s us. It’s you and me, bud. Like, me and you,” he continued. “We have to be the ones to be in their face and go, ‘You’re being a bad person right now. You are choosing to be a bad person right now, and I don’t know why you’re choosing that.”

    A person wearing glasses and a patterned shirt gestures while talking about the role of men in teaching and improving education for high school boys

    A person wearing glasses and a patterned shirt gestures while talking about the role of men in teaching and improving education for high school boys

    Person speaking in classroom, text reads:

    Person speaking in classroom, text reads:

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    “I don’t know what about your life right now put you in a position where you feel like you could just be a jerk, where you can just make jokes at the expense of others. But it’s not funny, it’s not good, it’s not right. Stop doing that.’”

    In his final plea, Austin explained that he’s worried about the future of the generation of boys growing up if something doesn’t change. “I just feel like the next couple years are gonna be very long and very hard, but I’m not a fan of the back end of Gen Z, and we’re about to start getting the start of Gen A, and we have to fix it,” he said.

    Person speaking about improving male roles in teaching within a classroom setting. Posters line the wall behind them

    “We have to fix it. We have to make sure these boys understand that running through the hallways and shouting, ‘Your body, my choice,’ is not OK. It’s not right. It’s not funny. I don’t know who you’re doing this for. There are no cameras here. You’re not going to blow up on TikTok. You’re just making women feel unsafe. Is that what you wanna be doing? Is that the life you wanna live? Is that the person you wanna be?”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    “I don’t think they do,” Austin remarked. “I don’t think that’s who they wanna be, so let’s remind them of that. Let’s actually take the effort to remind them of who they want to be in life, and then hold a mirror up to them and say, ‘Is that who you’re being?’ I don’t think so, bud.”

    Person speaking about improving education for high school boys, emphasizing the need for better teaching by men

    Since sharing his video, Austin has received an overwhelming amount of support from teachers, women, and parents. One male teacher even said Austin’s video makes him want to do better.

    Comments thanking teachers, acknowledging the importance of the conversation, and expressing gratitude and commitment to improvement

    Unfortunately, a concerning number of teachers also chimed in with their own similar experiences happening in their schools and classrooms. One person mentioned that a male English teacher in their school avoids teaching stories with female protagonists, claiming “the boys can’t empathize.” Austin challenged this notion, arguing that it is the teacher’s responsibility to bridge that gap so that harmful ideologies — like that men and women cannot inherently understand each other — are not perpetuated.

    Comments discussing gender biases and stereotypes in education, focusing on female protagonists in school curricula

    In his school, Austin told BuzzFeed that teachers are “giving up in droves,” partly because of the bad behavior. He said that multiple teachers have left at his school, and haven’t been replaced, compounding the issue with overflowing classrooms. Even worse, though, he said, is its impact on the women in the school.

    Person sitting at a desk with head in hands, in front of a chalkboard, appearing frustrated or stressed

    “I don’t think I can go a day anymore without one of my female colleagues crying openly in the hallway over the vitriol that has been sent their way,” he told BuzzFeed. “If you could access the behavior logs that administration keeps, you would see exactly how pervasive this issue has become.”

    Andrey Zhuravlev / Getty Images

    These experiences and the discussions he’s seen with other teachers online on “#TeacherTok” prompted Austin to speak out.

    Hashtag "#teachertok" with a total of 894.5K posts shown on a social media platform

    “My initial motivation was to just reach the teacher side of TikTok with a simple message to male teachers that we have to be the example for those boys who are currently lost,” he said. “I have seen way too many great teachers up and quit because of the abuse they experience on a daily basis, as someone in the room where it is all happening, I feel like its my duty to speak up and speak out for those who can’t.”

    TikTok

    Austin’s not the only one who’s spoken out about the growing, visible divide between men and women, especially in our current political sphere. Earlier this year, researchers found that a global ideological divide is forming, where young women are more progressive and young men are more conservative.

    John Burn-Murdoch / Financial Times / Via Twitter: @jburnmurdoch

    That shift became even more apparent in the US post-election — early exit poll data from swing states showed that 19-29 year-old men favored Trump 49-47%, while 18-29 year-old women favored Harris by 24 points, marking the largest gender gap within any age group, and for the first time showing that Gen Z might not be as progressive as many thought.

    On Substack, Alice Evans, one of the leading researchers on the topic from Stanford University, wrote that social media bubbles have created “echo chambers of righteous resentment, channeling frustrations and zero-sum mentalities against [women] and foreigners.” Others have also argued that this pervasive “Gen Z bro media diet” is partly to blame for the disconnect between young men and women (if you recall, the top podcasts in the world are dominated mainly by right-leaning bro hosts or apolitical content).

    Spotify podcast chart listing top 8 podcasts, including Joe Rogan, Shawn Ryan Show, Tucker Carlson, and others

    “Young men are seeing the strides women have made in the last several generations — out-earning men in college degrees and nearly tripling the share of women who earn as much or more than their husbands since the’ mid-70s — and feeling left behind and demonized by the left,” Rebecca Jennings, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote. She argued that algorithms further reward the content (it’s shocking and provocative); thus, men get further funneled into the “brosphere,” where the voices for toxic masculinity and bad behavior — the same that Austin witnesses in class — thrive.

    Spotify

    “Over the past two decades, as social progressivism has shined a light on movements like #MeToo, what we are seeing now is the backlash and the pendulum swing,” Austin said.

    “There is a concerted effort by profit-motivated men to target young boys in online circles and convince them that ‘being a man’ means not caring or having feelings about anything, focusing only on themselves, and treating women like garbage.”

    There’s been a lot of talk about the “male loneliness epidemic” (according to The New York Times, today’s young men are “lonelier than ever”), and many say these online brospheres are part of the problem.

    Man with headphones speaking into a microphone. Text on screen: "Property, Yes. Why my sister is her husband's property."

    The Independent laid it out as part of a larger, vicious cycle: early on, boys might be taught to be emotionally detached — to not cry, or show emotion – causing them to withdraw and feel lonely. They go looking for connection online (maybe on a “how to get a date” search), only to wind up on content that further reinforces the very stereotypes that hurt their connection and scapegoats women as the problem (think: Andrew Tate, who once argued that rape victims must “bear responsibility” for their attacks).

    Piers Morgan Uncensored / Via youtube.com

    “These men tell these boys daily that they are the only ones who understand them, that they are the only ones who get what they are going through, and the lonely 14-year-olds are eating that up,” Austin told BuzzFeed. “They have cornered the market on online spaces dominated by boys.”

    Austin also emphasized that parents play a role by allowing their children “unfettered access to online spaces” without fully considering the potential consequences. “Would you let your child — your 12-year-old, your 13-year-old, your 14-year-old — go to a rated R movie with zero supervision?” Austin asked in another viral clip. “That’s what you’re doing every time you allow them to go on YouTube, to go on TikTok, with zero supervision.”

    Person gesturing with both hands, text reads: "The consequence of Unfettered Internet Access for 14 year olds is on full display. Parents: that is on YOU."

    “Twelve-year-olds are interacting with grown men on a daily basis — grown men that their parents otherwise wouldn’t be allowing their kids around — because their parents have handed them a pocket-sized encyclopedia of the world with zero restrictions,” Austin told BuzzFeed. “People are essentially letting their elementary-aged children into NC-17 theaters with no supervision and expecting them to come out fine. Then they take everything they have learned and act out in class, emulating the reality they have been exposed to.”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    Despite all this discussion, I imagined plenty of people might look at Austin’s video and say, “Well, boy will be boys! This is nothing new.” In response to this kind of reaction, Austin said, “I think ‘boys will be boys’ has been an excuse that society has used for way too long to describe the lack of parenting boys.” He pointed to the comments on his video, where many argued that this kind of rhetoric only normalizes bad behavior, especially its impact on women.

    Three people discuss societal norms about gender behavior, questioning why boys aren't shamed for certain actions and pondering on the "boys will be boys" mentality

    “These boys need accountability; they cannot learn that anything they do will simply be excused away by the fact that they are boys. It is not inherent to boyhood to be racist, to be sexist, to be cruel, and crass, and I resent everyone who makes the argument that 14-year-olds making rape jokes in the face of young girls is ‘normal’ for them.”

    @awillmakeit / Via tiktok.com

    For parents and teachers wondering how they can better show up for their boys, Austin argued that it takes a concerted counter-effort to the voices that dominate their online space.

    A close-up of a smartphone screen displaying a social media profile with 4.7 million followers for Andrew Tate

    “We need to be the counter-example to what they are seeing online. We need to show them, through our actions, that they are not alone, and that there are versions of men that exist in the real world that are not misogynistic and un-empathetic,” he told BuzzFeed. “We need to show them that the ‘manosphere’ does not have a monopoly on the definition of what it means to be a ‘man,’ nor is there one correct way.”

    Matt Cardy / Getty Images

    As a final remark, he told BuzzFeed, “I do not believe these boys are broken, I do not believe they are beyond reproach, but they are lost and it will help all of us to recognize that. Too many are giving up on them right now because the battle feels lost, but these boys are still growing and learning, and I do absolutely believe that the vast majority of them want to be good. We just have to be vigilant in reminding them what that looks like.”

    For me, personally, I can only hope more male figures are like Austin — and if not, I hope they heed his advice and also want to do better, as the teacher earlier said. More than ever, I think more than one concept of “being a man” is needed right now, and I can only hope videos like this are helping to expose this.

    But let me know what you think — are you also facing a similar issue with young boys? Maybe you’re a parent, teacher, student, or mere observer with some thoughts — let us know in the comments.

  • The NBA’s ‘shot desert’ problem is real. Could 3-point dunks save us?

    Ja Morant is back and has Brook Lopez turned around. It’s November, and the electric point guard is leading the fast break in the third quarter against a porous Milwaukee Bucks transition defense. The slow-footed Lopez is the only obstacle between Morant and a thunderous finish at the basket. With Morant going downhill, this is a viral moment waiting to happen.

    But instead of jetting through Lopez for a rim-rocking dunk, Morant does something unexpected. He slams on the brakes and pulls up for a 3-pointer, missing badly off the far side of the rim.

    Morant didn’t dunk on that possession. Which, surprisingly, has been commonplace for the 25-year-old phenom.

    This season, Morant hasn’t dunked at all. In eight games, Morant has not completed a single dunk, missing both of his attempts (including this all-time blooper). Coming back from shoulder surgery, his dunk-attempt rate is a sliver of what it used to be. His 360 layups are a thing of beauty, but dunks they are not. Meanwhile, Morant, a poor 3-point shooter, continues to launch freely from deep.

    Morant represents the face of a growing grumble around the sport, that the product is suffering because the math says players should fire up 3s at a high rate, which some feel is at the expense of thrilling dunks at the rim.

    On opening night, after the Boston Celtics launched 61 3-point attempts in a sleepy rout over the New York Knicks, FS1’s Nick Wright, in a clip from his What’s Wright podcast that generated millions of views on X, lamented the modern playing style and called for the league to change its rules. Among Wright’s proposals was the suggestion that the NBA should make dunks worth three points to incentivize a better product for fans who, as the tumbling ratings suggest, appear to be increasingly disenchanted with the television offering.

    Boston, MA - October 22: Boston Celtics SF Jayson Tatum shoots a 3-point basket with pressure from New York Knicks SF OG Anunoby in the first quarter at TD Garden. (Photo by Danielle Parhizkaran/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)Boston, MA - October 22: Boston Celtics SF Jayson Tatum shoots a 3-point basket with pressure from New York Knicks SF OG Anunoby in the first quarter at TD Garden. (Photo by Danielle Parhizkaran/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
    The Celtics welcomed in the season by shooting — gulp! — 61 3s. (Boston Globe via Getty Images)

    “I know this sounds insane,” Wright said, “but at its core, the NBA is at its best when dudes are flying over people, meeting ’em at the rim. That is when it’s at its best television product. A bunch of finesse guys hanging out at the 3-point line hoisting 30-footers is not good TV.”

    So let’s try this on for size. What if dunks were worth three points instead of two? Would Morant have attempted to dunk on Lopez? How would that change alter the game? And is it addressing a problem worth trying to solve?

    I asked coaches, GMs and basketball experts about whether 3-point dunks would solve the NBA’s current predicament and the answers slowly revealed what is really lost in today’s game.


    With the Celtics running away with the 2024 NBA Finals armed with a historically heavy dose of 3-pointers, NBA teams have copied Joe Mazzulla’s blueprint and smashed through previous high marks of 3-balls this season. After settling at about 35 attempts per game the last few seasons, teams are launching with more fervor than ever before. On average, teams are attempting a record 37.4 triples per game this season, the largest year-over-year increase in about a half-decade, according to Stathead.com tracking.

    This was supposed to generate more dunk opportunities. Opposing big men have been pulled away from the basket. Driving lanes have opened up. Dunkers should be cleared for takeoff. However, despite wider pathways to the basket pried open by shooters anchored around the perimeter, the frequency of dunks has remained fairly flat in recent years.

    Last Friday, Anthony Edwards, who is widely considered among the game’s best in-game dunkers, delivered a ferocious slam over Kings center Domantas Sabonis. Those who want more of those highlight reel plays from Ant can thank former NBA vet Corliss Williamson. Ahead of the game, Williamson, now a Timberwolves assistant coach, made a comment to Edwards that he was “playing soft” this season. Edwards took it to heart evidently. “I told him I was gonna dunk on one of they a****,” Edwards shared with reporters after the game.

    Edwards, like Morant, isn’t dunking like he used to. Edwards’ slam over Sabonis was just his seventh dunk of the year, a season in which he has seen his dunk rate sliced in half. Meanwhile, he’s now shooting 11.3 3-pointers a game, up from 6.7 per game last season. It isn’t hard to see how Williamson’s “soft” comment could be code for “shooting too many 3s.”

    DeMar DeRozan, 35, is another skywalker who has yet to dunk this season after tallying 18 slams last season in Chicago. Part of that decline can be chalked up to his age, but it’s also indicative of a league that’s increasingly asking its wings to opt for the long ball. Utah backcourt mates Collin Sexton and Jordan Clarkson have yet to dunk after logging 36 combined slams last season, per Stathead.com tracking. Guards in today’s game dunk 0.32 times per game, down 8% since last season.

    So, make dunks worth three points. Easy fix, right? Not so fast. Canvassing the league, I found the 3-point dunk isn’t being met with open arms.

    “Going to the rim is still more advantageous than a 3,” said one team’s top basketball executive, “so I don’t think you need to increase dunk points.”

    There’s truth in the data. On average, a field-goal attempt located in the restricted area generates 1.32 points, which is more valuable than a 3-point shot, which yields 1.08 points. But that only scratches the surface of the value of a rim attack. The basket area is typically where shooters generate precious foul calls and those opportunities become instantly more valuable once the whistle is blown. In a sense, the extra value of a dunk attempt is already baked into a team’s calculus. Which is why there are still more shots in the paint than beyond the 3-point line in today’s game.

    Another concern about the 3-point dunk rule? Violence.

    “Injury seems like a more likely outcome,” said one Western Conference executive.

    Oklahoma City Thunder forward Chet Holmgren, left, and Golden State Warriors forward Andrew Wiggins (22) collide as Wiggins shoots during the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, Nov. 10, 2024, in Oklahoma City. Holmgren was injured on the play and helped off the court. (AP Photo/Nate Billings)Oklahoma City Thunder forward Chet Holmgren, left, and Golden State Warriors forward Andrew Wiggins (22) collide as Wiggins shoots during the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, Nov. 10, 2024, in Oklahoma City. Holmgren was injured on the play and helped off the court. (AP Photo/Nate Billings)
    Want 3-point dunks? Prepare for even more injuries to players. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

    Early last season, Edwards missed two games with a hip injury after crashing hard to the floor trying to dunk over OKC’s Jaylin Williams. Williams’ teammate, Chet Holmgren, wasn’t so lucky earlier this month. After a similarly vicious crash to the floor trying to prevent a dunk attempt by the soaring Andrew Wiggins, Holmgren fractured his hip and will be out for at least two months, jeopardizing the Thunder’s title quest and all but vaporizing his All-Star chances.

    As I wrote earlier in the season, the league is already facing an injury crisis. Raising the stakes to incentivize players to collide in midair at full speed doesn’t seem like a sustainable solution to the NBA’s existing problems. Don’t forget about the issue of injuries from striking the rim with your hand. (Drew Gooden once claimed he needed “seven or eight years” to heal from a wrist injury suffered while dunking.)

    Instead of making dunks worth three points, another league executive co-signed one of Wright’s proposals from his aforementioned podcast: make 3-pointers worth four points and 2-pointers worth three points. “But I doubt folks would go for that,” the executive conceded.

    I reached out to Nick Elam, the Ball State professor and inventor of the Elam Ending basketball innovation that was adopted by the NBA for All-Star Games and the The Basketball Tournament for his thoughts on Wright’s proposal to increase the reward for a dunk. He initially felt himself getting swayed by the merits of such an idea. It would likely reduce the number of 3-point shots and make for a more entertaining game, he surmised. But eventually, he wasn’t convinced the potential benefits outweighed the downsides.

    One obstacle, he pointed out, is the tricky matter of officiating. If a player fouls Morant on a layup, who’s to say that it wasn’t a dunk attempt and thus warrant three free throws?

    “We’ve never had to care [about that],” Elam said. “But under a 3-point dunk rule, we would have to care. We’d have to care so much that these types of fouls regularly result in challenges, replays, controversies with no clear or satisfying outcome, and so on.”

    Yeah, no thanks. We could avoid that problem by making all fouls inside the 3-point arc two-shot fouls.

    But there’s another downstream issue: What’s a dunk? We’d have to deploy the NBA’s player-tracking cameras on the hoop or put some sort of volleyball antenna on the rim to tell us whether a player actually “dunked” the ball. I’m already dreading the replay reviews.

    Tinkering with the point system seems like a noble exercise, but these ideas wouldn’t do enough to address the heart of the problem raised by Kirk Goldsberry:

    Everyone’s shooting the same damn shots.


    Elam calls them “shot deserts.” He believes that solving the NBA’s problem starts with filling in the areas of the floor — specifically, the mid-range zone, which is outside the paint and inside the 3-point arc — that have been abandoned by teams looking to squeeze every morsel of efficiency out of every possession.

    Since 3s are worth 50 percent more than 2s, and they convert at about the same rate as mid-range jumpers, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out why teams prefer one over the other. And now it seems everyone is wise to the math that has resulted in what feels like a widespread sameness to the league.

    “Yes, there are too many 3s — offensive possessions are stagnant and predictable,” Elam told Yahoo Sports. “For several years, large shot deserts have emerged on NBA courts, essentially anywhere inside the 3-point arc, except within arm’s reach of the rim. The sport is in need of recalibration to distribute shots more evenly around the court.”

    The numbers show a massive migration. In 1996-97, the first season of shot-location data, the Michael Jordan-led Chicago Bulls paced the league with 41.5 mid-range shots per game while the average team took about 32 attempts from that area. Over time, as analytically driven basketball minds began to see the wasteful average payoff of 20-footers, heaps of those same jump shots got pushed beyond the 3-point line.

    “Yes, there are too many 3s — offensive possessions are stagnant and predictable. The sport is in need of recalibration to distribute shots more evenly around the court.”Nick Elam

    This season, the leading purveyors of the mid-range, the Sacramento Kings, take just 14.1 shots from the same area that Jordan enjoyed, with the majority of the NBA taking single-digit attempts per game.

    The crazy thing? It’s gotten to the point that teams will go entire games without scoring from the mid-range area at all. This is what I’ll call the desert games.

    Remarkably, this season there have been 24 instances in which a team did not score a single point in the mid-range area, according to NBA.com/stats tracking. This is a mind-boggling figure. For decades, we never saw one such game — even as recently as 2010-11. Then one. Then two. Soon, 13. A big jump in 2018-19 to 64 (the Moreyball Rockets won 65 games the year before). Then, a plateau around 80 such games.

    Until this season.

    This season, we’ve already seen 24 such games, which means we’re on track for — get ready for this — 136 desert games. It happens almost every night now.

    The problem of league-wide sameness that Wright and Elam describe doesn’t just bear out in the sheer number of desert games. In a fascinating twist, desert games are not the exclusive property of one radical NBA team — say, the Boston Celtics — looking to hyper-emphasize the 3-point shot. In reality, 14 different teams this season have played an entire game without scoring in the mid-range. And it’s not just the good teams. Up and down the standings, teams have abandoned the mid-range. The league’s leader in desert games? The 3-11 Utah Jazz.

    This is a radical change in strategy that has transpired right before our eyes. When Stephen Curry came into the league in 2009, we went the entire season without seeing a desert game. Curry was the transcendent shooter that lit the fire. James Harden/Moreyball fanned the flames. The Celtics poured gasoline on it. Now it’s wildfire spreading across the league.

    In 2022, I had the opportunity to moderate a panel at the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference called NBA 75 to 100: The Future of the Game. Among those on the panel sat JJ Redick, now the head coach of the Los Angeles Lakers, and Daryl Morey, who leads the Philadelphia 76ers’ front office. The topic of 3-pointers inevitably came up. Redick, who played in Philadelphia for two seasons before Morey arrived, shared a story about a Sixers staffer encouraging him to trade a mid-range shot for a sidestep 3 because the percentages were better. Redick wanted to keep it in his bag.

    “Sometimes,” Redick said, “in a possession, the best shot is that pull-up [mid-range] jumper.”

    Fast forward two years later, Redick’s Lakers and Morey’s Sixers played a game in which neither team scored a single point from the mid-range area — that is, until LeBron James swished a 12-footer from the left baseline with 3:16 left in the fourth quarter. We were moments away from the NBA’s first-ever “shot desert” game in which both teams failed to score from the entire mid-range area, per NBA.com tracking.

    Track it next time you watch an NBA game. Notice how teams rarely take the open mid-range shot, opting instead to drive into the paint and kick. Drive and kick. Drive and kick. Until an open 3 is created. Or the rim protectors cry, “Uncle.” The Celtics won a championship with this brand of basketball.

    In the end, I don’t think I support the 3-point dunk rule even if I do want to incentivize the Morants and Edwardses of the world to be dunking more. From an injury standpoint, a 3-point dunk rule feels like something where the cure is worse than the disease. In such a world, high-flying athletes would be too injured to play in the long run and/or too protective of their careers to dunk every time down the floor. Can you imagine the trainwrecks in a fastbreak situation to break up a dunk? If you thought clear-path foul controversies were bad now, just wait.

    Any sort of rule change has to address that we’ve abandoned a huge area of the floor. If it wasn’t apparent before, the sudden rise of shot desert games should hammer it home.

    “You think the mid-range jumper is a lost art now?” Elam said. “Just wait until it is quantifiably even less efficient, relative to a dunk, than it is currently.”

    Also, if dunks were worth three, I think we’re thinking about the wrong guys. It’s not the flying wings who would benefit most. I actually think the most valuable players would be the Rudy Goberts and Giannis Antetokounmpos — guys who can dunk and prevent dunks.

    Who am I kidding? The MVP would probably be Victor Wembanyama. Until the end of time.

    HOUSTON, TEXAS - NOVEMBER 06: Victor Wembanyama #1 of the San Antonio Spurs defends a dunk attempt by Jalen Green #4 of the Houston Rockets in the first half at Toyota Center on November 06, 2024 in Houston, Texas.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Tim Warner/Getty Images)HOUSTON, TEXAS - NOVEMBER 06: Victor Wembanyama #1 of the San Antonio Spurs defends a dunk attempt by Jalen Green #4 of the Houston Rockets in the first half at Toyota Center on November 06, 2024 in Houston, Texas.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Tim Warner/Getty Images)
    OK, maybe dunking on Victor Wembanyama should be worth more. (Tim Warner via Getty Images)

    The NBA should look at what Major League Baseball did in 2023 to ban the shift and introduce the pitch clock. The league recognized the relentless data-driven pursuit of Three True Outcomes (strikeouts, walks and home runs) ruined the diversity of action on the field. The game became too predictable and the league took action against the rampant sameness.

    In the NBA, we ultimately want to watch competition, but our attention depends on the element of surprise to keep us locked in. The game, in its current form, is lacking some of that spontaneity and creativity. If the goal is to create more shot diversity, replenish the shot deserts and make the game more unpredictable, I have three other ideas that I prefer to the 3-point dunk:

    I like this concept from Goldsberry, the godfather of all basketball mapping. Eliminate the corner 3, or what he calls the loophole 3, and make the NBA’s shot economy more fair and “disincentivize loitering.”

    I’m with it in theory. My main concern is that the game would be exclusively played in the middle third of the floor. Why would you go anywhere near the corners if there’s no added bonus? Maybe you can get more open shots there. But I worry that eliminating the corner 3 is creating two parallel shot deserts on the outer thirds of the floor. But yeah, dudes standing idly in the corners ain’t it either.

    This is, in some ways, the most sensible tweak in the short-term. You might say, But what about all the court-level seats that we’d lose?! My former editor/boss Henry Abbott of TrueHoop always laughed at that concern. He’d get into the basic geometry of it all and point out that a wider court creates more courtside seats for owners to sell. So what if you’d lose a few seats in the second and third row? Seems like a billionaire problem, not one for the average NBA fan. Even still, decreasing supply would likely increase demand. As one executive put it: “They would make more money if they expanded the court as fewer seats always equals more money.” To that point, have you tried to buy a ticket at Cameron Indoor Stadium?

    From a basketball perspective, it doesn’t solve the shot diversity problem. I’m not sure there is a complete fix for that unless you go full Rock N’ Jock and add a 25-point basket (17 feet above the floor) and 50-point basket (25 feet and 6 inches). Watching a teenaged Kevin Garnett celebrate by screaming in Gary Payton’s face because GP hit a 50-pointer … my eyes are welling up from nostalgia.

    I’m campaigning for the 2-3-4 system where there’s a deep 4-point line and a shorter 3-point line that brings back the mid-range. I’ve long-been a supporter of the 4-point line that incentivizes logo shots. They’re awesome, but slapping a deep 4-point line on the court doesn’t solve the shot desert problem.

    (Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports Illustration)(Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports Illustration)
    (Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports Illustration)

    So, we shorten the old 3-point arc. Make it 15 feet at the apex (where the nail at the free-throw line currently is now) and broaden it to about 17 feet in the corners. Anything inside it is 2 points. Take the old 3-point arc and slide it back to 35 feet. That’s the four-point line. Make it 40 feet? Sure, let’s see what happens. In between those lines, that’s the 3-point zone.

    I want logo shots and mid-range shots and paint shots. I want all of it.

    Basically, I want shot selection back.