(Bloomberg) — Sub soarele și cerul senin și albastru, pe un fundal perfect al emblematicului Munte Sugarloaf din Rio, liderii Grupului de 20 s-au adunat pentru „fotografie de familie”. A existat o singură problemă: președintele american Joe Biden a dispărut.
Cele mai citite de la Bloomberg
Tradiționala oportunitate de fotografiere a căzut în farsă luni, când Biden, premierul canadian Justin Trudeau și premierul italian Giorgia Meloni au lipsit din grup.
Acest lucru a devenit clar, totuși, odată ce președintele brazilian Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva a pozat pentru poza cu ceilalți lideri mondiali, după care s-au dispersat pentru discuții ulterioare.
A fost poate un act de protest împotriva prezenței ministrului rus de externe Serghei Lavrov, care îl înlocuia pe președintele Vladimir Putin? Sau au întârziat unele întâlniri bilaterale? În cele din urmă, se pare că s-a datorat dezorganizarii.
Un oficial american a învinuit problemele logistice și a spus că fotografia de familie a fost făcută devreme. Absența lui Biden nu a fost un act de protest, a spus oficialul, vorbind sub condiția anonimatului.
Organizatorii brazilieni spun că Biden și ceilalți au întârziat. S-ar putea să încerce să-i adună pe toți liderii din nou pentru o refilmare – ceea ce ar fi o premieră în istoria G-20.
Dar simbolismul era inconfundabil. Lipsa de unitate între lideri este o reflectare a cât de dificil a fost să-i aducem pe toți pe aceeași pagină la summit.
Biden a fost în mare parte invizibil la această adunare în timp ce își petrece ultimele două luni la Casa Albă. Dar el nu este în niciun caz singura rață șchioapă. Francezul Emmanuel Macron a fost bătut de alegători, iar germanul Olaf Scholz se îndreaptă spre alegeri anticipate și probabil va fi exclus de la putere.
Pe scurt, Occidentul a apărut în dezordine.
Asta i-a permis lui Xi Jinping din China să se plimbe și să ajungă în centrul scenei. Lula din Brazilia a fost flancat de gazda anterioară a G-20 — Narendra Modi din India — și de următoarea — Cyril Ramaphosa din Africa de Sud. Argentinianul Javier Milei, care a fost un ghimpe în coasta lui Lula, pândea chiar în spatele lui și lângă Macron, cu care se pare că a făcut o legătură la această întâlnire.
Lavrov a fost ascuns în siguranță în spate, lângă omologul său saudit.
Premierul britanic Keir Starmer a ieșit singur la soare. Mai devreme, el l-a enervat pe Xi, mustrându-l public pe China cu privire la drepturile omului și aducându-l pe Taiwan. Fiorul dintre cei doi a fost palpabil, deoarece au evitat contactul, despărțiți doar de liderul australian Anthony Albanese.
Zicala că o imagine valorează mai mult decât o mie de cuvinte nu ar putea fi mai adevărată când vine vorba de tradiția anuală G-20 a fotografiei de familie. De la înființarea sa în 1999, acest instantaneu în timp spune povestea creșterii și scăderii colaborării dintre cele mai puternice economii ale lumii.
Au fost maxime – ca atunci când s-au unit pentru a depăși criza financiară globală în 2008 – și au fost minime.
În aceste momente, liderii își lasă adesea garda jos. Și atunci când se amestecă în poziție – unii ajung mai târziu (sau deloc), unii s-au înghețat, alții șoptesc și chicotesc în lateral – că observatorii pasionați pot obține informații despre starea diplomației internaționale.
Limbajul corpului dintre lideri dezvăluie adesea dacă se plac cu adevărat unul pe celălalt sau dacă stau în picioare, așteaptă doar clicul camerei înainte de a putea fugi.
Summit-ul de la New Delhi, pe fondul ploilor musonice, a prevestit dificultățile care aveau în față la acel summit. India a abandonat configurația obișnuită, deoarece liderii nu au putut să cadă de acord cu privire la ce să facă cu Lavrov după ce Putin – care devenise un paria după invazia sa din 2022 a Ucrainei – a evitat călătoriile.
De atunci, mareele s-au schimbat oarecum.
Indignarea și condamnarea au făcut loc unei conștienți începători printre mulți lideri de aici că Ucraina ar putea fi nevoită să accepte pierderea unei părți din teritoriul său în cadrul negocierilor pentru a pune capăt războiului.
Unul dintre cele mai grăitoare momente din adunarea de familie a fost Macron îndreptându-se spre locul unde stătea Lavrov și strângând pentru scurt timp mâna.
Nu cu mult timp în urmă, Volodymyr Zelenskiy a fost atracția vedetă la summiturile și parlamentele globale din întreaga lume. Dar, pe măsură ce oboseala războiului s-a instalat, prăpastia dintre Occidentul care încă îl sprijină și puterile emergente ale Sudului Global s-a lărgit.
Modi nu a vrut ca el să fure spectacolul de la G-20 din New Delhi, asta era totul despre proiectarea ascensiunii Indiei, iar Lula a simțit aproape la fel.
Planul de astăzi a fost să-i invităm pe toți și să pună în discuție problemele din diplomația globală. Lula spera literalmente să înece diferențele având mai mulți oameni în cadru.
În schimb, în timp ce Xi se ținea de mână cu colegii lideri și zâmbea, Meloni și-a dat seama că ea și Trudeau lipseau.
Potrivit unui raport de la piscină, ea a răsuflat și a spus „Fotografia!”
–Cu asistența lui Justin Sink și Brian Platt.
(Adaugă detalii despre Macron și Lavrov în al 20-lea paragraf. O versiune anterioară a acestei povești a corectat ortografia prenumelui prim-ministrului britanic în al 12-lea paragraf și o literă lipsă din Brazilia în al 10-lea.)
Keir Starmer ha expresado su preocupación al presidente chino, Xi Jinping, por las sanciones a los parlamentarios británicos y el deterioro del ciudadano británico y activista por la democracia de Hong Kong Jimmy Lai, en una reunión en la cumbre del G20 en Río.
El primer ministro del Reino Unido prometió una “relación sólida entre el Reino Unido y China” y dijo que ambos habían acordado que no debería haber más “sorpresas” entre los dos países. Dijo que deseaba celebrar una reunión completa con su homólogo chino, Li Qiang, en Beijing o Londres lo antes posible.
Los funcionarios chinos sacaron a los periodistas británicos de la reunión cuando Starmer planteó la difícil situación de Lai, que se encuentra detenido en Hong Kong.
En el primer encuentro entre el presidente chino y un primer ministro británico en seis años, Starmer también planteó la cuestión de los derechos humanos, incluidas las sanciones a varios diputados conservadores, como el ex ministro de seguridad Tom Tugendhat, el vicepresidente de la Cámara de los Comunes, Nus Ghani. y el exlíder conservador Iain Duncan Smith.
Starmer dijo que la pareja había reconocido que querían que “las relaciones fueran consistentes, duraderas, respetuosas y, como hemos acordado, evitar sorpresas siempre que sea posible”.
“Una relación sólida entre el Reino Unido y China es importante para nuestros dos países y para la comunidad internacional en general”, dijo al final de la reunión. “El Reino Unido será un actor predecible, coherente y soberano comprometido con el Estado de derecho”.
Propuso una reunión bilateral completa con el primer ministro Li en Beijing o Londres, y que la canciller, Rachel Reeves, se reúna con su homólogo, He Lifeng, lo que se espera que tenga lugar en Beijing en enero.
“Estoy interesado en que mi Canciller se reúna con el Viceprimer Ministro He para el próximo diálogo económico financiero a principios del próximo año para explorar más proyectos de inversión y unas condiciones más equitativas para ayudar a nuestras empresas”, dijo Starmer.
“Estoy muy contento de que mi secretario de Asuntos Exteriores y mi ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, Wang, se hayan reunido recientemente para discutir sus respectivas preocupaciones, incluidas las relativas a los derechos humanos y las sanciones parlamentarias, Taiwán, el Mar de China Meridional y nuestro interés compartido en Hong Kong. Estamos preocupados por los informes sobre el deterioro de Jimmy Lai”.
En un marcado cambio de tono con respecto a años anteriores, Xi dijo que Starmer estaba “fijando los cimientos” de la economía del Reino Unido, haciéndose eco del propio eslogan del primer ministro. Dijo que la pareja “abriría nuevos caminos” en la relación.
“El mundo ha entrado en un nuevo período marcado por turbulencias y transformaciones”, dijo Xi en la reunión. “El nuevo gobierno del Reino Unido está trabajando para arreglar las bases de la economía y reconstruir Gran Bretaña y ha establecido la visión de una Gran Bretaña reconectada. Y China está profundizando aún más la reforma en todos los ámbitos para avanzar en la modernización china”.
Tugendhat y la ex presidenta del comité de asuntos exteriores, Alicia Kearns, ambos destacados críticos conservadores de China, habían pedido a Starmer que aprovechara la reunión para plantear a Xi la difícil situación de los ciudadanos del Reino Unido, incluido Lai, el propietario de un medio de comunicación prodemocracia detenido y juzgado en Hong Kong. .
Ningún primer ministro británico se ha reunido con Xi desde que Theresa May visitó Beijing en 2018 en medio de un impulso comercial durante las negociaciones del Brexit, aunque Boris Johnson habló con el presidente chino durante la pandemia.
Desde entonces, las relaciones se han enfriado significativamente debido a las amenazas cibernéticas, la represión de los derechos humanos en Hong Kong y las sanciones contra los parlamentarios.
Rishi Sunak intentó renovar las relaciones en la cumbre del G20 de 2022, donde estaba prevista una reunión bilateral pero fue cancelada debido a los acontecimientos en Ucrania. Los líderes conservadores han jugado con la posibilidad de designar a China como una amenaza a la seguridad británica, un lenguaje más fuerte que el que había utilizado Estados Unidos.
El secretario de Asuntos Exteriores, David Lammy, visitó China el mes pasado en la primera señal de que el nuevo gobierno laborista consideraba la renovación de mejores relaciones como una prioridad diplomática. Reeves, que se entiende que está asumiendo un papel de liderazgo en la búsqueda de nuevas oportunidades económicas con China, viajará a Beijing en enero.
Starmer y Reeves han estado buscando descongelar las relaciones con la segunda economía más grande del mundo por motivos pragmáticos, sugiriendo que el Reino Unido no puede lograr sus ambiciones de crecimiento sin mejores términos con China.
Keir Starmer will go into meeting with Chinese president with ‘eyes wide open’, says minister
Good morning. Keir Starmer is in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil for the G20 summit, where later today he will become the first UK prime minister in six years to meet the Chinese president, Xi Jinping. As Jessica Elgot reports, Starmer says he wants “a pragmatic and serious relationship” with China.
But, inevitably, not everyone is happy. The Daily Mail is splashing on criticism of the meeting from some Tories. When David Cameron was PM, he cultivated Xi with an eagerness and enthusiasm that makes Starmer look quite hostile towards China by comparison, but over the past decade Tory thinking about China has changed considerably, and the Mail story quotes Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former leader, saying “those suffering genocide and slave labour under the brutal hands of Xi will feel betrayed.”
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has been doing an interview round this morning. Speaking on Sky News, she defended Starmer’s decision to meet Xi. She said he would be going into the meeting with his “eyes wide open”. She explained:
China is a major player both in terms of the economy but also in the [UN] security council so it is right that we have that engagement, but that we do so on a pragmatic basis where we go into it with our eyes wide open.
That does mean there will be challenge, constructive challenge, and there will be areas of profound disagreement.
Here is the agenda for the day.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
1.30pm: Philip Barton, permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, gives evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee.
Afternoon: Starmer is in Rio de Janeiro, where most of the G20 events will take place in the afternoon or evening UK time.
2.30pm: John Healey, the defence secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
3.15pm: David Lammy, the foreign secretary, chairs a meeting of the UN security council on Sudan.
After 3.30pm: Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, is expected to give a statement to MPs about plans to crack down on profiteering by firms running care home for children.
4pm: Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, gives evidence to the Lords international agreements committee.
Also, at some point today, Steve Reed, the environment secretary, is meeting Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president. Tomorrow farmers are holding a major protest in London about the government’s plans to subject some farms to inheritance tax.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X because the site has become too awful. But individual Guardian journalists are still there, I have still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I was trying Threads for a bit, but I am stepping back from that because it’s not a good platform for political news.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Key events
Starmer says UK wants ‘strong’ relationship with China as he meets Xi Jinping
Keir Starmer said that a “strong UK China relationship is important for both of our countries” as he met Chinese President Xi Jinping on the fringes of the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, PA Media reports.
If you are looking for something a bit lighter to break things up this morning, Simon Hattenstone’s interview with the former Tory MP, and newbie reality TV star, Jacob Rees-Mogg is a good read.
Assisted dying bill ‘doomed’ if government does not allocate more time for debate after second reading, experts claim
In her Today interview Harriet Harman, the former Labour deputy leader, claimed that Keir Starmer and Lucy Powell, the leader of the Commons, have both said that the assisted dying bill will get “as much time as it needs” for detailed, line-by-line debate, if it passes the second reading vote on Friday week. She said:
I do not think the government is showing any signs of wanting to restrict the debate. It then goes to the Lords … The only time constraint is this needs to be finished by November next year.
But on the same programme Nikki da Costa, a former Tory adviser who was director of legislative affairs in Downing Street under Theresa May and Boris Johnson, said she thought Harman was wrong. She pointed out that the bill is much longer than private members’ bills (PMBs) normally are, but that the time allocated for it is just the standard PMB slot. She said only five hours have been set aside for report stage. If MPs cannot get through all the amendments in that time, the bill will go “to the back of the queue”, she said. Some MPs have asked the government to allocate extra time. But da Costa pointed that that Starmer, at PMQs last week, and Powell, at business questions on Thursday, have both refused to accept that is needed.
Da Costa’s assessment is in line with the assessment of the Hansard Society, the thinktank focusing on parliamentary matters. In its latest Parliamentary Matters podcast, Ruth Fox, the Hansard Society director, and Mark D’Arcy, the former BBC journalist, discuss at length why, even if it gets a second reading, the bill will struggle to get through parliament without the government giving it extra time. “If the government isn’t going to move to provide more time for this bill, frankly it’s doomed,” D’Arcy says. Fox agrees.
There is a transcript of the podcast here.
Tom Watson defends Streeting’s right to speak out on assisted dying bill after Harriet Harman says he ‘crossed the line’
Harriet Harman, the former Labour party deputy leader, used an interview on the Today programme this morning to criticise Wes Streeting, the health secretary, for his stance on the assisted dying bill. Echoing comments she made in an interview with the Observer, she said:
I do think that [Streeting has] crossed the line and has given the impression that the government is not neutral …
If government ministers, especially the secretary of state, for health, if they speak out, then the government’s position of neutrality is compromised. Individual MPs will be feeling as if they have to support the government or be against the government, and this principle of neutrality on moral issues is very important.
Tom Watson, another former deputy Labour leader who, like Harman, is now in the House of Lords, criticised her comments. In posts on social media this morning, he said that he has changed his mind on assisted dying, and is now in favour. But he also defended Streeting’s right to speak out on this matter.
1/ After opposing assisted dying in the Commons a decade ago, I was convinced to change my view by a constituent while serving as an MP. Their story stayed with me and shaped my perspective. #AssistedDyingBill
2/ Today, I deeply admire the work of Kim Leadbeater and will support her bill. The proposed safeguards are thoughtful, thorough, and, if anything, more restrictive than I had anticipated. #TerminallyIllAdultsBill
3/ I am surprised to see my House of Lords colleague, Harriet Harman, making media appearances in recent days criticising Health Secretary Wes Streeting. He is doing his job and is entitled to his position.
4/ MPs should absolutely be made aware of the practicalities of new legislation. That is the essence of good governance and responsible debate. #AssistedDying
5/ I sincerely hope campaigners for the Bill focus on dialogue, not confrontation. Shouting down proper debate risks deterring those, like me, who have considered and changed their stance. #OpenDebate
Amnesty International UK has urged Keir Starmer to raise the case of Jimmy Lai, the pro-democracy activist and British national imprisoned in Hong Kong, when he meets the Chinese president, Xi Jinping.
Amnesty’s chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said:
The appalling state of human rights across China must be top of the agenda, including raising alarm about the industrial-scale repression of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet, the crushing of press freedom and hounding of activists and critics in Hong Kong and China.
Prime Minister Starmer must also be clear that China’s campaign of terrorising students and campaigners here in the UK will not be tolerated.
Nigel Farage is leader with most voters who like him, but Green’s Carla Denyer has highest net approval rating, poll suggests
Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, has more voters who like him than any other leading politician – but also more who dislike him than most other leading figures, according to polling from Ipsos.
The figures show that 28% of people have a favourable view of him – but 48% have an unfavourable view of him, giving him a net score of -20.
Keir Starmer’s net score is -29, and Rachel Reeves’ is -32. Kemi Badenoch has a net score of -18, but this could be partly because fewer people have a firm view about her one way or the other.
The same factor applies to the Green party co-leaders, Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay, and the Lib Dem leader, Ed Davey, who all have much higher net approval ratings than the other people included in the Ipsos survey. On this measure, Denyer is the most popular leader (with a net score of -9), followed by Ramsay and Davey (both on -10).
Last week similar polling by YouGov presented a very similar picture.
Commenting on the figures, Keiran Pedley, director of UK politics at Ipsos, said:
These numbers show that politicians are not a popular bunch in Britain right now, with more Britons holding unfavourable opinions than favourable for all of the ones on our list. Nigel Farage has the highest proportion favourable overall, but it remains to be seen whether he can convert that into increased support for Reform UK moving forward.
Education secretary Bridget Phillipson says she is opposed to assisted dying bill
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has said is opposed to the private member’s bill that would allow assisted dying.
Asked for her stance on the bill, which will be debated in the Commons on Friday week, Phillipson said:
As you’ll know, the government takes a neutral position on this, so it’s for individual members of parliament to arrive at their own conclusion, to come to their own view.
Back in 2015 when this was last before parliament, I voted against the measure, and in that time, I haven’t changed my mind.
Asked why she was opposed to the bill, Phillipson said that she did not want to give too much detail, because the government as a whole is neutral on the bill, and so ministers are not meant to be trying to sway the argument. She said she was worried about people being coerced into taking their own life. But she acknowledged that supporters of the bill believe it contains safeguards that would address this problem.
Peter Walker has the full story here.
In her interview with Sky News this morning Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, was asked if the UK would follow Joe Biden in giving Ukraine permission to use missiles to attack targets in Russia. She replied:
The prime minister and the defence secretary will always keep under review what the Ukrainian government asked of us by way of support.
We have provided considerable military assistance to the Ukrainian people in their fight against that terrible Russian aggression that we have seen, and as we come up to that 1,000 days of the conflict, it’s more stark than ever what the Ukrainian people have had to go through.
It is thought that Starmer has been in favour of allowing Ukraine to fire Storm Shadow missiles at targets in Russia for some time, although the PM has not said that publicly. The missiles are made jointly made by the British and the French, but to attack targets in Russia they would need access to a US missile guidance system.
As Dan Sabbagh explains, the Biden decision reportedly applies to US-made Atacms rockets.
Keir Starmer will go into meeting with Chinese president with ‘eyes wide open’, says minister
Good morning. Keir Starmer is in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil for the G20 summit, where later today he will become the first UK prime minister in six years to meet the Chinese president, Xi Jinping. As Jessica Elgot reports, Starmer says he wants “a pragmatic and serious relationship” with China.
But, inevitably, not everyone is happy. The Daily Mail is splashing on criticism of the meeting from some Tories. When David Cameron was PM, he cultivated Xi with an eagerness and enthusiasm that makes Starmer look quite hostile towards China by comparison, but over the past decade Tory thinking about China has changed considerably, and the Mail story quotes Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former leader, saying “those suffering genocide and slave labour under the brutal hands of Xi will feel betrayed.”
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has been doing an interview round this morning. Speaking on Sky News, she defended Starmer’s decision to meet Xi. She said he would be going into the meeting with his “eyes wide open”. She explained:
China is a major player both in terms of the economy but also in the [UN] security council so it is right that we have that engagement, but that we do so on a pragmatic basis where we go into it with our eyes wide open.
That does mean there will be challenge, constructive challenge, and there will be areas of profound disagreement.
Here is the agenda for the day.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
1.30pm: Philip Barton, permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, gives evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee.
Afternoon: Starmer is in Rio de Janeiro, where most of the G20 events will take place in the afternoon or evening UK time.
2.30pm: John Healey, the defence secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
3.15pm: David Lammy, the foreign secretary, chairs a meeting of the UN security council on Sudan.
After 3.30pm: Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, is expected to give a statement to MPs about plans to crack down on profiteering by firms running care home for children.
4pm: Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, gives evidence to the Lords international agreements committee.
Also, at some point today, Steve Reed, the environment secretary, is meeting Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president. Tomorrow farmers are holding a major protest in London about the government’s plans to subject some farms to inheritance tax.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X because the site has become too awful. But individual Guardian journalists are still there, I have still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I was trying Threads for a bit, but I am stepping back from that because it’s not a good platform for political news.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Sir Keir Starmer se reunirá con el presidente Xi Jinping en la cumbre del G20 esta semana y el gobierno afirmará que quiere un “compromiso estable y pragmático” con China.
El primer ministro dirá que es correcto comprometerse con China en “áreas de cooperación mutua” como la estabilidad internacional, el cambio climático y el crecimiento económico.
Pero Downing Street dijo que también “sería firme en la necesidad de tener conversaciones honestas sobre áreas de desacuerdo” y que el compromiso estaría “basado en todo momento en los intereses nacionales del Reino Unido”.
En declaraciones a los periodistas de camino a la reunión en Río de Janeiro, Sir Keir dijo que “apuntalar el apoyo a Ucrania” era una prioridad en su agenda.
La reunión entre Sir Keir y Xi será la primera vez que un primer ministro del Reino Unido se reúna personalmente con el presidente chino desde 2018.
Downing Street dijo que se esperaba que los dos se reunieran el lunes.
La pareja habló por teléfono en agosto, después de la victoria electoral del Partido Laborista el mes anterior, pero aún no se han conocido en persona.
El apoyo militar de China a la guerra de Rusia en Ucrania ha provocado críticas del Reino Unido y otros países occidentales.
El primer ministro dijo: “Lo mejor para el Reino Unido es participar en el escenario global, ya sea construyendo asociaciones sólidas y fructíferas con nuestros aliados más cercanos o siendo francos con aquellos cuyos valores difieren de los nuestros”.
“Una estrecha cooperación con las principales economías del mundo es vital para asegurar la inversión en el Reino Unido y crear los empleos necesarios para catalizar el crecimiento”.
El Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, David Lammy, mantuvo conversaciones con su homólogo chino, Wang Yi, así como con el Viceprimer Ministro Ding Xuexiang, en Beijing el mes pasado.
La última primera ministra británica que se reunió con el presidente Xi fue Theresa May, quien elogió una “era dorada” para las relaciones entre el Reino Unido y China durante su visita al país en 2018.
Sin embargo, desde entonces ha habido tensiones por cuestiones como el trato que China da al grupo minoritario uigur en Xinjiang y a los activistas prodemocracia en Hong Kong.
El año pasado, el entonces Primer Ministro conservador Rishi Sunak dijo que China era “la mayor amenaza estatal a nuestra seguridad económica”.
Pero al igual que el gobierno actual, también dijo que era necesario comprometerse con China en cuestiones como el cambio climático y la economía global.
El G20, que está integrado por 19 países con las mayores economías mundiales, además de la Unión Africana y la Unión Europea, se reúne en la ciudad brasileña de Río de Janeiro.
Downing Street dijo que el primer ministro también se centraría en construir asociaciones que aumenten el crecimiento económico y la seguridad durante la cumbre, acelerar la transición climática y el uso de energía limpia y apoyar el desarrollo económico de los países en desarrollo.
Ucrania estará “en lo más alto de la agenda” esta semana en una reunión de líderes de las economías más poderosas del mundo, ha prometido Keir Starmer, aunque dijo que no tenía “planes” de seguir al canciller alemán, Olaf Scholz, y hablar directamente con Vladímir Putin.
Starmer se reunirá con los líderes mundiales el lunes en la cumbre del G20 en Brasil, a la que el presidente ruso se ha negado a asistir, enviando en su lugar a su ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, Sergei Lavrov.
En declaraciones a los periodistas camino a la cumbre, el primer ministro del Reino Unido dijo que era significativo que los líderes se reunieran casi 1.000 días después de la guerra de Rusia y dijo que “tiene que haber apoyo total durante el tiempo que sea necesario”, citando el uso de Corea del Norte. Los soldados coreanos en la guerra son un acontecimiento particularmente inquietante.
Los líderes mundiales se reunirán en Río de Janeiro para la cumbre, donde hay una importante división sobre el enfoque hacia Ucrania y un aire de impotencia ante el inminente regreso de Donald Trump a la Casa Blanca. El presidente electo ha señalado que Estados Unidos adoptará un enfoque diferente para financiar la defensa de Ucrania.
Durante la noche, Rusia disparó más de 200 misiles y drones en toda Ucrania, apuntando a la red energética del país, en el mayor ataque contra Ucrania desde agosto y el primer ataque ruso significativo desde las elecciones estadounidenses.
Starmer asistirá a la cumbre junto al presidente chino, Xi Jinping, el primer ministro indio, Narendra Modi, y el presidente saliente de Estados Unidos, Joe Biden.
El primer ministro del Reino Unido dijo que “no tenía planes de hablar con Putin” cuando se le preguntó sobre la llamada de Scholz. Dijo: “El martes nos acercamos al día número 1.000 de este conflicto: son 1.000 días de agresión rusa, 1.000 días de enorme impacto y sacrificio en relación con el pueblo ucraniano, y recientemente hemos visto la incorporación de Corea del Norte. tropas que trabajan con los rusos, lo que tiene serias implicaciones.
“Creo que, por un lado, muestra la desesperación de Rusia, pero tiene graves implicaciones para la seguridad europea, ese elemento adicional añadido, y para la seguridad del Indo-Pacífico, y es por eso que creo que debemos redoblar nuestros esfuerzos para reforzar nuestro apoyo. Ucrania y eso es una prioridad en mi agenda para el G20”.
Starmer negó que la reunión del G20 fuera inútil, con una división tan extrema entre los líderes presentes, no sólo en Ucrania sino también en cuestiones económicas, el clima y la igualdad de género.
El presidente argentino, Javier Milei, es un estrecho aliado de Trump y fue el primer líder mundial en visitar al presidente electo en su residencia de Florida. Se dice que está poniendo una serie de obstáculos al comunicado formal. El presidente francés, Emmanuel Macron, visitó a Milei de camino a la cumbre en un intento de aliviar las tensiones y salvar un acuerdo de la reunión.
“Nos reuniremos con las economías más grandes del mundo en los próximos días y mi misión número uno es hacer crecer nuestra economía y atraer inversiones a nuestro país”, dijo Starmer.
“Así que voy a aprovechar esa oportunidad en el G20 para hacer exactamente eso. Y obviamente, cuando se trata de seguridad, hay cuestiones realmente importantes aquí y ahora en lo que respecta a Ucrania que creo que valen la pena, y es importante que las persigamos. Y es por eso que intentaré hacer lo que pueda”.